Predatory Pricing in Japan – The Battle Between Yamato and Japan Post in the Parcel Delivery Market
Posted by Social Science Research Network
Predatory Pricing in Japan – The Battle Between Yamato and Japan Post in the Parcel Delivery Market Simon Vande Walle (European Union)
Abstract: This article summarizes and comments on Yamato v. Japan Post, one of Japan’s leading cases on predatory pricing. The case clarified the test to assess whether prices are predatory and, hence, unlawful. The case was triggered by the introduction of a new price scheme by Japan Post. Yamato alleged the new prices were predatory and sought injunctive relief before the courts. The Tokyo District Court in 2006 and, on appeal, the Tokyo High Court in 2008 both sided with defendant Japan Post and dismissed the lawsuit.
Featured News
New York AG Wins Antitrust Battle Against Intermountain Management Over Ski Market Competition
Mar 10, 2025 by
CPI
Rocket Cos. to Acquire Redfin in $1.75 Billion All-Stock Deal
Mar 10, 2025 by
CPI
EU Conducts Dawn Raids on Non-Alcoholic Drink Giants Over Competition Concern
Mar 10, 2025 by
CPI
NY Attorney General Takes Legal Action Against Allstate for Cybersecurity Failures
Mar 10, 2025 by
CPI
Britain’s Antitrust Regulator Sets Clearer Path for Big Tech Oversight
Mar 10, 2025 by
CPI
Antitrust Mix by CPI
Antitrust Chronicle® – Self-Preferencing
Feb 26, 2025 by
CPI
Platform Self-Preferencing: Focusing the Policy Debate
Feb 26, 2025 by
Michael Katz
Weaponized Opacity: Self-Preferencing in Digital Audience Measurement
Feb 26, 2025 by
Thomas Hoppner & Philipp Westerhoff
Self-Preferencing: An Economic Literature-Based Assessment Advocating a Case-By-Case Approach and Compliance Requirements
Feb 26, 2025 by
Patrice Bougette & Frederic Marty
Self-Preferencing in Adjacent Markets
Feb 26, 2025 by
Muxin Li