Posted by Social Science Research Network
Fair Use and the Antitrust Case in the Google Books Project Roberto Taufick (Stanford Law School)
Abstract: This paper addresses why, in our opinion, fair use is not clear in Google’s Book project as materialized so far and how come competitive concerns should trigger thorough scrutiny from antitrust authorities even if the project does not survive the fair use defense. It also suggests that Pierre Leval’s transformation test should be incorporated into the competitive prong of the fair use test — both because the more transformative the use, the less the secondary use competes and therefore conflicts with the copyright, and insofar as this shift would bring more relevance to the final part of section 107(1) of the Copyright Act in the first part of the test.
Featured News
Malaysia Grants Licenses to WeChat and TikTok Under New Social Media Law
Jan 2, 2025 by
CPI
Axinn Announces Promotions of Antitrust Experts
Jan 2, 2025 by
CPI
Federal Competition Office to Scrutinize High Electricity Prices in Germany
Jan 2, 2025 by
CPI
Mexican Lawmakers Advance Controversial Plan to Dissolve Independent Oversight Bodies
Jan 2, 2025 by
CPI
Motorola Accuses UK of Antitrust Breach Over Terminated Emergency Services Contract
Jan 2, 2025 by
CPI
Antitrust Mix by CPI
Antitrust Chronicle® – CRESSE Insights
Dec 19, 2024 by
CPI
Effective Interoperability in Mobile Ecosystems: EU Competition Law Versus Regulation
Dec 19, 2024 by
Giuseppe Colangelo
The Use of Empirical Evidence in Antitrust: Trends, Challenges, and a Path Forward
Dec 19, 2024 by
Eliana Garces
Some Empirical Evidence on the Role of Presumptions and Evidentiary Standards on Antitrust (Under)Enforcement: Is the EC’s New Communication on Art.102 in the Right Direction?
Dec 19, 2024 by
Yannis Katsoulacos
The EC’s Draft Guidelines on the Application of Article 102 TFEU: An Economic Perspective
Dec 19, 2024 by
Benoit Durand