An appeals court in Finland ruled Friday to reopen a case exploring allegations of price-fixing by lumber companies, say reports.
The Helkinki Court of Appeal decided that there was no statute of limitations on the case, first launched by independent forest owners against forestry conglomerates Story Enso and UPM and state lands regulator Metsäliitto. The case will now be handed back down to the Helsinki District Court, which will reopen the case.
The District Court ruled last March that the lawsuit, filed by more than 650 independent forest owners, had exceeded the statute of limitations.
The dispute began when the nation’s Market Court found in 2009 that the three defendants formed a wood purchasing cartel between 1997 and 2004 to fix lumber prices. Competition authorities issued fines in the case, but the Market Court did not have jurisdiction to rule on whether the defendants’ actions harmed timber traders, reports say.
Landowners subsequently took the matter to court themselves.
At the heart of the statute of limitations disagreement is whether the case technically began in 2004, when UPM first came forward with evidence of the collusive behavior, or in 2010, when the Market Court’s ruling took effect.
The appellate court ruled the latter.
Full content: Yle Uutiset
Want more news? Subscribe to CPI’s free daily newsletter for more headlines and updates on antitrust developments around the world.
Featured News
Massachusetts AG Sues Insulin Makers and PBMs Over Alleged Price-Fixing Scheme
Jan 14, 2025 by
CPI
Apple and Amazon Avoid Mass Lawsuit in UK Over Alleged Collusion
Jan 14, 2025 by
CPI
Top Agent Network Drops Antitrust Suit Against National Association of Realtors
Jan 14, 2025 by
CPI
Weil, Gotshal & Manges Strengthens Antitrust Practice with New Partner
Jan 14, 2025 by
CPI
Russian Court Imposes Hefty Fine on Google for Non-Compliance with Content Removal Orders
Jan 14, 2025 by
CPI
Antitrust Mix by CPI
Antitrust Chronicle® – CRESSE Insights
Dec 19, 2024 by
CPI
Effective Interoperability in Mobile Ecosystems: EU Competition Law Versus Regulation
Dec 19, 2024 by
Giuseppe Colangelo
The Use of Empirical Evidence in Antitrust: Trends, Challenges, and a Path Forward
Dec 19, 2024 by
Eliana Garces
Some Empirical Evidence on the Role of Presumptions and Evidentiary Standards on Antitrust (Under)Enforcement: Is the EC’s New Communication on Art.102 in the Right Direction?
Dec 19, 2024 by
Yannis Katsoulacos
The EC’s Draft Guidelines on the Application of Article 102 TFEU: An Economic Perspective
Dec 19, 2024 by
Benoit Durand