Microsoft has filed a lawsuit against South Korea’s Samsung Electronics, a move that is heating up a disagreement between the two over patent royalty payments.
According to reports, Microsoft and Samsung signed a contract in which Samsung agreed to pay patent royalties to Microsoft. But after Microsoft’s decision to acquire Nokia’s handset operations, Samsung has refused to pay those royalties.
Samsung reportedly argues that the 2011 agreement to pay royalties on Microsoft patents does not apply to products sold by Microsoft after its acquisition of Nokia. Microsoft agrees, and has now filed a lawsuit against Samsung, which Microsoft says eventually paid the disputed royalties but has refused to pay interest.
According to reports, Microsoft first began seeking royalty payments from handset makers to ramp up its ability to compete in the smartphone market. Samsung, LG and HTC have all signed agreements to do so. Motorola, however, has refused to sign the agreement; the companies have been involved in a separate legal battle since 2010 over the dispute.
Microsoft is seeking monetary recover from Samsung but the company has not publicized exactly how much it is seeking.
Samsung has previously expressed disapproval of Microsoft’ acquisition of Nokia, arguing that Nokia is now demanding higher patent likening fees from the company following Microsoft’s acquisition. Nokia was feared to become a patent troll after Microsoft acquires its handset operations, leaving Nokia to evolve into a company that depends on its intellectual property for profits.
Full content: Reuters
Want more news? Subscribe to CPI’s free daily newsletter for more headlines and updates on antitrust developments around the world.
Featured News
Judge Appoints Law Firms to Lead Consumer Antitrust Litigation Against Apple
Dec 22, 2024 by
CPI
Epic Health Systems Seeks Dismissal of Antitrust Suit Filed by Particle Health
Dec 22, 2024 by
CPI
Qualcomm Secures Partial Victory in Licensing Dispute with Arm, Jury Splits on Key Issues
Dec 22, 2024 by
CPI
Google Proposes Revised Revenue-Sharing Limits Amid Antitrust Battle
Dec 22, 2024 by
CPI
Japan’s Antitrust Authority Expected to Sanction Google Over Monopoly Practices
Dec 22, 2024 by
CPI
Antitrust Mix by CPI
Antitrust Chronicle® – CRESSE Insights
Dec 19, 2024 by
CPI
Effective Interoperability in Mobile Ecosystems: EU Competition Law Versus Regulation
Dec 19, 2024 by
Giuseppe Colangelo
The Use of Empirical Evidence in Antitrust: Trends, Challenges, and a Path Forward
Dec 19, 2024 by
Eliana Garces
Some Empirical Evidence on the Role of Presumptions and Evidentiary Standards on Antitrust (Under)Enforcement: Is the EC’s New Communication on Art.102 in the Right Direction?
Dec 19, 2024 by
Yannis Katsoulacos
The EC’s Draft Guidelines on the Application of Article 102 TFEU: An Economic Perspective
Dec 19, 2024 by
Benoit Durand