The Delaware Court of Chancery is arguably the most influential business court in the nation, according to reports, and hears more cases related to mergers and acquisitions lawsuits than any other. Now, Vice Chancellor J. Travis Laster, who has spend nearly five years on the court, is emerging as the top watchdog over M&A disputes.
Laster’s reputation has been built on challenging both plaintiffs and defendants, shooting down settlements, and lambasting advisers regarding the cases that challenge some of the largest deals. That reputation is only expected to grow, reports say, amid the latest M&A boom.
According to reports, last year 94 percent of all mergers were followed by shareholder lawsuits on grounds that takeover prices were too low. But in recent months, Laster has cracked down on settlements made by merging companies to quell shareholders by disclosing more information and paying lawyers in order to close their transactions.
He has also held a strong grip on bankers, reports say. Last March Laster found RBC Capital Markets liable for “behind-the-scenes maneuvering” during the bank’s 2011 acquisition of Rural/Metro. In 2011, Laster slammed Barclays for manipulating the sale of Del Monte Foods to earn higher fees, reports say.
Now, experts predict more high-profile lawsuits to follow the high-profile mergers that have been announced, including Comcast’s acquisition of Time Warner Cable, AT&T’s acquisition of DirecTV, and Sprint’s expected acquisition of T-Mobile, among other multibillion-dollar transactions.
Full content: Wall Street Journal
Want more news? Subscribe to CPI’s free daily newsletter for more headlines and updates on antitrust developments around the world.
Featured News
Electrolux Fined €44.5 Million in French Antitrust Case
Dec 19, 2024 by
CPI
Indian Antitrust Body Raids Alcohol Giants Amid Price Collusion Probe
Dec 19, 2024 by
CPI
Attorneys Seek $525 Million in Fees in NCAA Settlement Case
Dec 19, 2024 by
CPI
Italy’s Competition Watchdog Ends Investigation into Booking.com
Dec 19, 2024 by
CPI
Minnesota Judge Approves $2.4 Million Hormel Settlement in Antitrust Case
Dec 19, 2024 by
CPI
Antitrust Mix by CPI
Antitrust Chronicle® – CRESSE Insights
Dec 19, 2024 by
CPI
Effective Interoperability in Mobile Ecosystems: EU Competition Law Versus Regulation
Dec 19, 2024 by
Giuseppe Colangelo
The Use of Empirical Evidence in Antitrust: Trends, Challenges, and a Path Forward
Dec 19, 2024 by
Eliana Garces
Some Empirical Evidence on the Role of Presumptions and Evidentiary Standards on Antitrust (Under)Enforcement: Is the EC’s New Communication on Art.102 in the Right Direction?
Dec 19, 2024 by
Yannis Katsoulacos
The EC’s Draft Guidelines on the Application of Article 102 TFEU: An Economic Perspective
Dec 19, 2024 by
Benoit Durand