The London benchmark used to price much of the world’s gold may have been manipulated for as long as a decade, according to new research.
New York University Stern School of Business Professor Rosa Abrantes-Metz and Moody’s Investors Service managing director Albert Metz released a draft research paper that reports say shows irregular trading patterns at the time when gold prices are set between dealers. It’s evidence of possible collusion, the researchers said, and should be investigated.
According to the report, “the structure of the benchmark is certainly conducive to collusion and manipulation, and the empirical data are consistent with price artificiality.”
The work has not yet been submitted for publication.
The researchers suggest that Barclays, Deutsche Bank, Bank of Nova Scotia, HSBC and Societe Generale could possibly be responsible for the alleged collusion; those banks are responsible for overseeing the gold benchmark setting.
The findings come as regulators continue probing allegations of foreign exchange benchmark rate manipulation, which follows the worldwide LIBOR scandal in which major banks were found to have manipulated the LIBOR interest rate benchmark.
Full Content: Bloomberg
Want more news? Subscribe to CPI’s free daily newsletter for more headlines and updates on antitrust developments around the world.
Featured News
Massachusetts AG Sues Insulin Makers and PBMs Over Alleged Price-Fixing Scheme
Jan 14, 2025 by
CPI
Apple and Amazon Avoid Mass Lawsuit in UK Over Alleged Collusion
Jan 14, 2025 by
CPI
Top Agent Network Drops Antitrust Suit Against National Association of Realtors
Jan 14, 2025 by
CPI
Weil, Gotshal & Manges Strengthens Antitrust Practice with New Partner
Jan 14, 2025 by
CPI
Russian Court Imposes Hefty Fine on Google for Non-Compliance with Content Removal Orders
Jan 14, 2025 by
CPI
Antitrust Mix by CPI
Antitrust Chronicle® – CRESSE Insights
Dec 19, 2024 by
CPI
Effective Interoperability in Mobile Ecosystems: EU Competition Law Versus Regulation
Dec 19, 2024 by
Giuseppe Colangelo
The Use of Empirical Evidence in Antitrust: Trends, Challenges, and a Path Forward
Dec 19, 2024 by
Eliana Garces
Some Empirical Evidence on the Role of Presumptions and Evidentiary Standards on Antitrust (Under)Enforcement: Is the EC’s New Communication on Art.102 in the Right Direction?
Dec 19, 2024 by
Yannis Katsoulacos
The EC’s Draft Guidelines on the Application of Article 102 TFEU: An Economic Perspective
Dec 19, 2024 by
Benoit Durand