Letter to Chairman Wheeler: Economic Evidence on Competition in Communications Markets and Implications for Key Policy Issues
Posted by Social Science Research Network
Letter to Chairman Wheeler: Economic Evidence on Competition in Communications Markets and Implications for Key Policy Issues by Robert D. Atkinson (Information Technology and Innovation Foundation), Kevin W. Caves (Navigant Economics), Robert W. Crandall (Brookings Institution ; AEI-Brookings Joint Center for Regulatory Studies), Wayne Crews (Competitive Enterprise Institute (CEI)), Everett Ehrlich (ESC Company), Jeffrey A. Eisenach (American Enterprise Institute ; George Mason University School of Law), Gerald R. Faulhaber (University of Pennsylvania – Wharton School,) Robert W. Hahn (University of Oxford, Smith School ; Georgetown University), Kevin A. Hassett (American Enterprise Institute (AEI)), Steve Pociask (The American Consumer Institute), Hal J. Singer (Navigant Economics LLC), Timothy J. Tardiff (Advanced Analytical Consulting Group,) Leonard Waverman (Berkeley Research Group), and Dennis Weisman (Kansas State University – Department of Economics)
ABSTRACT: Dear Chairman Wheeler:
Congratulations on your confirmation as Chairman of the Federal Communications Commission. As economists who study and write about communications policy and regulation, we agree with your comment during your confirmation hearing that “the role of the FCC has evolved from acting in the absence of competition to dictate the market, to promoting and protecting competition with appropriate oversight.” The economic evidence on this point is clear: in all but a few areas, communications networks no longer have the characteristics of natural monopolies, and should no longer be regulated as public utilities. Indeed, the convergence of the communications sector into the dynamic, intensely competitive Internet ecosystem is now virtually complete.
We write because we believe these economic facts have important implications for some of the key challenges facing you and the Commission in the months and years ahead.
Featured News
Electrolux Fined €44.5 Million in French Antitrust Case
Dec 19, 2024 by
CPI
Indian Antitrust Body Raids Alcohol Giants Amid Price Collusion Probe
Dec 19, 2024 by
CPI
Attorneys Seek $525 Million in Fees in NCAA Settlement Case
Dec 19, 2024 by
CPI
Italy’s Competition Watchdog Ends Investigation into Booking.com
Dec 19, 2024 by
CPI
Minnesota Judge Approves $2.4 Million Hormel Settlement in Antitrust Case
Dec 19, 2024 by
CPI
Antitrust Mix by CPI
Antitrust Chronicle® – CRESSE Insights
Dec 19, 2024 by
CPI
Effective Interoperability in Mobile Ecosystems: EU Competition Law Versus Regulation
Dec 19, 2024 by
Giuseppe Colangelo
The Use of Empirical Evidence in Antitrust: Trends, Challenges, and a Path Forward
Dec 19, 2024 by
Eliana Garces
Some Empirical Evidence on the Role of Presumptions and Evidentiary Standards on Antitrust (Under)Enforcement: Is the EC’s New Communication on Art.102 in the Right Direction?
Dec 19, 2024 by
Yannis Katsoulacos
The EC’s Draft Guidelines on the Application of Article 102 TFEU: An Economic Perspective
Dec 19, 2024 by
Benoit Durand