The European Commission’s efforts to curb so-called pay-for-delay schemes appears to be working, as reports show a decrease in such deals made in 2012 compared to earlier years.
Reports say just seven percent of agreements made between drug makers in 2012 involved pay-for-delay agreements; that number compares with an average of 22 percent of pay-for-delay agreements made between 2000 and 2008.
The data suggests the Commission’s campaign against the agreements, which allow brand name drug firms to pay cheaper, generic drug makers to keep their versions off pharmacy shelves, is working and does not hamper companies from settling pharmaceutical patent disputes, the majority of which did not raise EU competition concerns.
Recent cases involving such pay-for-delay schemes involve the Commission’s fine imposed on Lundbeck and eight other companies last June; more recently, sources say the Commission is planning a fine against Johnson & Johnson and Novartis. The regulator is also investigating Teva and subsidiary Cephalon as well as France-based Servier.
The data was announced by European Commissioner Joaquin Almunia during a speech on Monday.
Full Content: Reuters
Read the full speech here.
Want more news? Subscribe to CPI’s free daily newsletter for more headlines and updates on antitrust developments around the world.
Featured News
Judge Appoints Law Firms to Lead Consumer Antitrust Litigation Against Apple
Dec 22, 2024 by
CPI
Epic Health Systems Seeks Dismissal of Antitrust Suit Filed by Particle Health
Dec 22, 2024 by
CPI
Qualcomm Secures Partial Victory in Licensing Dispute with Arm, Jury Splits on Key Issues
Dec 22, 2024 by
CPI
Google Proposes Revised Revenue-Sharing Limits Amid Antitrust Battle
Dec 22, 2024 by
CPI
Japan’s Antitrust Authority Expected to Sanction Google Over Monopoly Practices
Dec 22, 2024 by
CPI
Antitrust Mix by CPI
Antitrust Chronicle® – CRESSE Insights
Dec 19, 2024 by
CPI
Effective Interoperability in Mobile Ecosystems: EU Competition Law Versus Regulation
Dec 19, 2024 by
Giuseppe Colangelo
The Use of Empirical Evidence in Antitrust: Trends, Challenges, and a Path Forward
Dec 19, 2024 by
Eliana Garces
Some Empirical Evidence on the Role of Presumptions and Evidentiary Standards on Antitrust (Under)Enforcement: Is the EC’s New Communication on Art.102 in the Right Direction?
Dec 19, 2024 by
Yannis Katsoulacos
The EC’s Draft Guidelines on the Application of Article 102 TFEU: An Economic Perspective
Dec 19, 2024 by
Benoit Durand