The probable outcome of the US Supreme Court case concerning arbitration clauses remains unclear after Wednesday’s oral arguments, especially as Justice Anthony Kennedy suggested the record may be underdeveloped. Kennedy, considered a possible swing vote, added that the merchants’ claims against American Express Co – that the company’s arbitration clause improperly barred the merchants to effectively bring a claim against the company – may not be able to be determined. Reports, however, say both sides remain optimistic at their chances. Previous Supreme Court cases have secured the existence of the clauses, which prevent class actions from being taken up against companies. In this case, the merchants are arguing in American Express Co v. Italian Colors Restaurant that the clauses bar merchants from effectively bringing federal claims to court. Lawsuits filed against the credit card company have been filed by other merchants in California and New York considering the matter.
Featured News
Baker McKenzie Welcomes Back Former DOJ Antitrust Official
Feb 9, 2026 by
CPI
EU Flags Potential Antitrust Breach by Meta Over WhatsApp AI Restrictions
Feb 9, 2026 by
CPI
US Drops Antitrust Case Against German Fragrance Maker Symrise
Feb 9, 2026 by
CPI
Autodesk Sues Google Over Use of ‘Flow’ Trademark in AI Software Dispute
Feb 9, 2026 by
CPI
Indiana Reaches $6.25 Million Settlement in EpiPen Price-Fixing Case
Feb 9, 2026 by
CPI
Antitrust Mix by CPI
Antitrust Chronicle® – Hub-&-Spoke Conspiracies
Jan 26, 2026 by
CPI
A Data Analytics Company as the Hub in a Hub-and-Spoke Cartel
Jan 26, 2026 by
Joseph Harrington
Hub and Spoke Cartels
Jan 26, 2026 by
Patrick Van Cayseele
Hub-and-Spoke Collusion or Vertical Exclusion? Identifying the Rim in Hub-and-Spoke Conspiracies
Jan 26, 2026 by
Rosa Abrantes-Metz, Pedro Gonzaga, Laura Ildefonso & Albert Metz
The Algorithmic Middleman in a Hub-and-Spoke Conspiracy: Divergent Court Decisions and the Expanding Patchwork of State and Local Regulations
Jan 26, 2026 by
Bradley C. Weber