The Supreme Court has ruled the Spanish Competition Commission (CNC) did not infringe on the constitutional rights of a cosmetic company when it seized entire hard disks from the company’s files during an investigation, a ruling that experts say reinforces the CNC’s authority. The CNC had been investigating STANPA, the national association of manufacturers of cosmetic and perfumery products, and in doing so obtained and copied several hard disks of some STANPA employees. The National Appeal Court had ruled that the document raid had violated STANPA’s constitutional rights as the CNC had carried out the acts without prior notice to STANPA, and ordered the CNC to return any materials obtained that did not contain information pertaining to the case. The Supreme Court has ruled in favor of the CNC, however.
Featured News
Big Banks Want Washington to Hit the Brakes on Crypto Banking Licenses
Feb 13, 2026 by
CPI
UK Government Orders Review of Daily Mail Owner’s £500 Million Telegraph Bid
Feb 12, 2026 by
CPI
FTC Warns Apple Over Alleged Political Bias in Apple News
Feb 12, 2026 by
CPI
California Is Cracking Down on Lawyers Who Let AI Do Their Homework
Feb 12, 2026 by
CPI
Google Under New EU Scrutiny Over Alleged Search Ad Price Manipulation
Feb 12, 2026 by
CPI
Antitrust Mix by CPI
Antitrust Chronicle® – Hub-&-Spoke Conspiracies
Jan 26, 2026 by
CPI
A Data Analytics Company as the Hub in a Hub-and-Spoke Cartel
Jan 26, 2026 by
Joseph Harrington
Hub and Spoke Cartels
Jan 26, 2026 by
Patrick Van Cayseele
Hub-and-Spoke Collusion or Vertical Exclusion? Identifying the Rim in Hub-and-Spoke Conspiracies
Jan 26, 2026 by
Rosa Abrantes-Metz, Pedro Gonzaga, Laura Ildefonso & Albert Metz
The Algorithmic Middleman in a Hub-and-Spoke Conspiracy: Divergent Court Decisions and the Expanding Patchwork of State and Local Regulations
Jan 26, 2026 by
Bradley C. Weber