Discriminatory Pricing in Software Sales and Competition Law: More Efficiency than Harm?
Posted by D. Daniel Sokol
Qiang Yu (Leiden Law School) asks Discriminatory Pricing in Software Sales and Competition Law: More Efficiency than Harm?
ABSTRACT: Discriminatory Pricing is a practice that can be used either to eliminate competitors or to charge consumers deserving prices, both of which are condemned by competition law. However, Discriminatory Pricing is often accompanied by certain positive effects. For instance, it allows more consumers to consume the product and thus commit to economies of scale. Therefore, there are no illegal issues associated with Discriminatory Pricing per se. This paper observes that Discriminatory Pricing practices occur in the software market. The software market is a new market that differs from traditional markets in many aspects. Although factors such as network effects and innovation competition provide an environment conducive to the proliferation of Discriminatory Pricing, these factors also remove the eliminative and exploitative aspects of Discriminatory Pricing in the software market. Traditional regulation is not well suited to regulating software Discriminatory Pricing. Software Discriminatory Pricing is a commonly used marketing strategy and should not be subject to restrictions by competition law. This paper analyzed the possibility of abusive Discriminatory Pricing in the software market and suggested a test for assessing such abuse. Accordingly, this paper has concluded that software Discriminatory Pricing is efficient.
Featured News
Judge Appoints Law Firms to Lead Consumer Antitrust Litigation Against Apple
Dec 22, 2024 by
CPI
Epic Health Systems Seeks Dismissal of Antitrust Suit Filed by Particle Health
Dec 22, 2024 by
CPI
Qualcomm Secures Partial Victory in Licensing Dispute with Arm, Jury Splits on Key Issues
Dec 22, 2024 by
CPI
Google Proposes Revised Revenue-Sharing Limits Amid Antitrust Battle
Dec 22, 2024 by
CPI
Japan’s Antitrust Authority Expected to Sanction Google Over Monopoly Practices
Dec 22, 2024 by
CPI
Antitrust Mix by CPI
Antitrust Chronicle® – CRESSE Insights
Dec 19, 2024 by
CPI
Effective Interoperability in Mobile Ecosystems: EU Competition Law Versus Regulation
Dec 19, 2024 by
Giuseppe Colangelo
The Use of Empirical Evidence in Antitrust: Trends, Challenges, and a Path Forward
Dec 19, 2024 by
Eliana Garces
Some Empirical Evidence on the Role of Presumptions and Evidentiary Standards on Antitrust (Under)Enforcement: Is the EC’s New Communication on Art.102 in the Right Direction?
Dec 19, 2024 by
Yannis Katsoulacos
The EC’s Draft Guidelines on the Application of Article 102 TFEU: An Economic Perspective
Dec 19, 2024 by
Benoit Durand