In a development favorable to the capital’s water utility Tallinna Vesi (CPI reported), the Supreme Court said it will not review the Competition Authority’s complaint regarding the company’s legal interpretation of its pricing mechanism. The agency has argued that the water utility’s tariff mechanism is a civil law contract, which the company can not use in administrative court. However, Tallinna Vesi maintains that the rate-setting rules, which were established during privatization, are an administrative contract.
Full Content: ERR
Related Content: Tallinna Vesi investigations
Related Content: Regulation by Declaration: A Novel Regulatory Mechanism to Limit Abuse of Monopoly Power
Want more news? Subscribe to CPI’s free daily newsletter for more headlines and updates on antitrust developments around the world.
Featured News
FTC Moves Forward with Microsoft Antitrust Probe
Mar 12, 2025 by
CPI
Boies Schiller Flexner Expands in California
Mar 12, 2025 by
CPI
Compass Lexecon Welcomes Renowned Expert in Telecommunications and Antitrust
Mar 12, 2025 by
CPI
UK Competition Watchdog Opens Consultation on Merger Remedies
Mar 12, 2025 by
CPI
Volunteer Coaches Win Bid to Certify Class in Antitrust Lawsuit Against NCAA
Mar 12, 2025 by
CPI
Antitrust Mix by CPI
Antitrust Chronicle® – Self-Preferencing
Feb 26, 2025 by
CPI
Platform Self-Preferencing: Focusing the Policy Debate
Feb 26, 2025 by
Michael Katz
Weaponized Opacity: Self-Preferencing in Digital Audience Measurement
Feb 26, 2025 by
Thomas Hoppner & Philipp Westerhoff
Self-Preferencing: An Economic Literature-Based Assessment Advocating a Case-By-Case Approach and Compliance Requirements
Feb 26, 2025 by
Patrice Bougette & Frederic Marty
Self-Preferencing in Adjacent Markets
Feb 26, 2025 by
Muxin Li