Diogo Thomson de Andrade, Carlos Ragazzo, Jul 24, 2012
Throughout the world, competition authorities are used to allocating much of their human resources to cartel detection and punishment. The main justification for this allotment is linked to the potential harm that these agreements pose for the economy and, foremost, to consumers. It is not a coincidence that many countries criminalize cartels, requiring action not just on behalf of competition authorities but also that of other investigative State authorities, such as, for example, public prosecutors.
Featured News
Joseph Saveri Law Firm Adds Veteran Antitrust Litigator
Feb 19, 2026 by
CPI
Antitrust Case Against Live Nation Moves Toward Jury Trial
Feb 19, 2026 by
CPI
State Attorneys General Signal They Will Continue Antitrust Fight Against Live Nation if DOJ Settles
Feb 19, 2026 by
CPI
French Antitrust Raid Targets Passenger Transport Sector
Feb 18, 2026 by
CPI
FTC Moves to Bring Back Rules To Make It Easier for Consumers to Cancel Subscriptions
Feb 18, 2026 by
CPI
Antitrust Mix by CPI
Antitrust Chronicle® – Hub-&-Spoke Conspiracies
Jan 26, 2026 by
CPI
A Data Analytics Company as the Hub in a Hub-and-Spoke Cartel
Jan 26, 2026 by
Joseph Harrington
Hub and Spoke Cartels
Jan 26, 2026 by
Patrick Van Cayseele
Hub-and-Spoke Collusion or Vertical Exclusion? Identifying the Rim in Hub-and-Spoke Conspiracies
Jan 26, 2026 by
Rosa Abrantes-Metz, Pedro Gonzaga, Laura Ildefonso & Albert Metz
The Algorithmic Middleman in a Hub-and-Spoke Conspiracy: Divergent Court Decisions and the Expanding Patchwork of State and Local Regulations
Jan 26, 2026 by
Bradley C. Weber