EU State Measures Against Foreign Takeovers: Economic Patriotism in All But Name (reprint)
Nelson Jung, Alex Nourry, Jun 19, 2012
This article examines the compatibility of special rights and other state measures with the EC’s single market objectives within the framework of the EC Treaty and their impact on foreign takeovers and investments. It also examines the initiatives taken by the Commission in order to eliminate such measures and analyzes the potential remedies available to foreign investors when confronted with such measures. Such remedies include the application of the Commission’s powers under Article 21 of the EC Merger Regulation that arguably could be used to even greater effect with the abolition or curtailment of the two-thirds rule.
Featured News
Republican State Attorneys General Urge Federal Review of Union Pacific–Norfolk Southern Merger
Feb 17, 2026 by
CPI
Redfin and Zillow Press Court to Dismiss FTC Antitrust Suit
Feb 17, 2026 by
CPI
European Commission Launches DSA Investigation into Shein Over Illegal Products
Feb 17, 2026 by
CPI
British Government Vows Changes to Toughen Children’s Online Safety Laws
Feb 17, 2026 by
CPI
Warner Bros Discovery Gives Paramount One Week to Improve $30-Per-Share Bid as Netflix Deal Advances
Feb 17, 2026 by
CPI
Antitrust Mix by CPI
Antitrust Chronicle® – Hub-&-Spoke Conspiracies
Jan 26, 2026 by
CPI
A Data Analytics Company as the Hub in a Hub-and-Spoke Cartel
Jan 26, 2026 by
Joseph Harrington
Hub and Spoke Cartels
Jan 26, 2026 by
Patrick Van Cayseele
Hub-and-Spoke Collusion or Vertical Exclusion? Identifying the Rim in Hub-and-Spoke Conspiracies
Jan 26, 2026 by
Rosa Abrantes-Metz, Pedro Gonzaga, Laura Ildefonso & Albert Metz
The Algorithmic Middleman in a Hub-and-Spoke Conspiracy: Divergent Court Decisions and the Expanding Patchwork of State and Local Regulations
Jan 26, 2026 by
Bradley C. Weber