In response to the General Court’s partial annulment of the European Commission’s 2009 ING Restructuring Decision, the Commission has approved the plan to provide legal clarity. Without the second approval decision, the annulment had the effect of leave 90 percent of the state aid uncovered by EC approval. The measures were for a 10 billion euro capital injection by the Dutch State for ING Group.
The Commission is also appealing the General Court’s judgment to the EU Court of Justice. The General Court questioned the Commission’s calculation that the change of terms for repaying the aid included a further 2 billion euros. As a result, the General Court annulled the entire assessment of the restructuring plan. In a memo outling the FAQ of the decision, the Commission explains that it does not agree that the MEIP test needed to be performed, and that the General Court went beyond what was requested by annulling the finding that the entire measure constitutes compatible state aid.
Furthermore, the Commission has opened an in-depth investigation into amendments to the 2009 plan made by the Netherlands and ING, due to implementation concerns and the complexity of the issues. The investigation will look at three issues:
1. ING did not pay adequate remuneration to the Netherlands in 2010 and 2011, despite reporting profits. The Commission will thus “assess the possibilities of still achieving sufficient remuneration for the State.”
2. The Commission will determine how to address distortions in ING’s home market, since the Dutch State and ING believe that the divestment of Westland Utretcht Bank is not feasible.
3. Following a complaint, the Commission will examine ING Direct’s pricing behavior and use of state aid.
Full content: EC Press Release
Related content: Stability and Competition in EU Banking During the Financial Crisis: The Role of State Aid Control (Gert-Jan Koopman, DG Comp)
Want more news? Subscribe to CPI’s free daily newsletter for more headlines and updates on antitrust developments around the world.
Featured News
Judge Appoints Law Firms to Lead Consumer Antitrust Litigation Against Apple
Dec 22, 2024 by
CPI
Epic Health Systems Seeks Dismissal of Antitrust Suit Filed by Particle Health
Dec 22, 2024 by
CPI
Qualcomm Secures Partial Victory in Licensing Dispute with Arm, Jury Splits on Key Issues
Dec 22, 2024 by
CPI
Google Proposes Revised Revenue-Sharing Limits Amid Antitrust Battle
Dec 22, 2024 by
CPI
Japan’s Antitrust Authority Expected to Sanction Google Over Monopoly Practices
Dec 22, 2024 by
CPI
Antitrust Mix by CPI
Antitrust Chronicle® – CRESSE Insights
Dec 19, 2024 by
CPI
Effective Interoperability in Mobile Ecosystems: EU Competition Law Versus Regulation
Dec 19, 2024 by
Giuseppe Colangelo
The Use of Empirical Evidence in Antitrust: Trends, Challenges, and a Path Forward
Dec 19, 2024 by
Eliana Garces
Some Empirical Evidence on the Role of Presumptions and Evidentiary Standards on Antitrust (Under)Enforcement: Is the EC’s New Communication on Art.102 in the Right Direction?
Dec 19, 2024 by
Yannis Katsoulacos
The EC’s Draft Guidelines on the Application of Article 102 TFEU: An Economic Perspective
Dec 19, 2024 by
Benoit Durand