Ken Heyer, Sheldon Kimmel, Nov 01, 2009
In recessions, we expect to see an increase in both the number and share of mergers where at least one of the parties is having difficulty independently staying afloat. This raises the importance of adopting a sound framework for analyzing merging firms in some form of financial distress. This paper concludes that, while it can be hard to evaluate a failing firm defense under the Merger Guidelines, the principles underlying the test are generally sound, even when the overall economy is going through very difficult times. The recent severe downturn may lead to more proposed mergers between financially distressed firms, but it does not imply that looser standards ought to be applied when evaluating them
Featured News
FTC Asks Appeals Court to Reinstate Expanded Merger Disclosure Rule
Feb 19, 2026 by
CPI
Lawmakers Seek GAO Review of State and Federal AI Regulations
Feb 19, 2026 by
CPI
UK Flags Editorial Content Concerns in Getty-Shutterstock Merger
Feb 19, 2026 by
CPI
DOJ Examines Warner Bros. Sale as Theater Chains Voice Concerns
Feb 19, 2026 by
CPI
Australia Court Fines Mobil A$16 Million Over Misleading Fuel Claims
Feb 19, 2026 by
CPI
Antitrust Mix by CPI
Antitrust Chronicle® – The Gig Economy
Feb 19, 2026 by
CPI
Market Power and Governance Power: New Tools for Antitrust Enforcement in the Decentralized Gig Economy
Feb 19, 2026 by
Seth C. Oranburg
10 Years of Labor Antitrust Guidance: Lessons for Workers and the Gig Economy
Feb 19, 2026 by
Richard Powers & Michael Swerdlow
Antitrust & Gig Workers: Labor Exemption As Protection
Feb 19, 2026 by
Marina Lao
Beyond Non Competes: Platform Tethered Non Circumvention Clauses for Digital Platforms
Feb 19, 2026 by
Scott Nelson, Hugh Hollman & John Baker