China’s Approach to Compulsory Licensing of Intellectual Property Under Its Anti-Monopoly Law
Michael Jacobs, Xinzhu Zhang, Nov 05, 2010
While a discussion of the misuse of Intellectual Property Rights (IPRs) can be quite broad, this paper focuses on one aspect of a significant question regarding the relationship between antitrust and IP laws:Whether and on what terms courts and competition regulators should compel a dominant firm to license its powerful intellectual property to a smaller rival. As many know, this question has already generated substantial controversy, largely because the relevant law in the United States and Europe provide markedly different answers. In China’s context, since compulsory licensing of IP is so complicated and subtle an issue, it may be too soon to recommend any specific approach. Certainly, more discussion and research are needed. However, as outlined in this paper, certain preliminary steps should be taken.
Featured News
French Antitrust Raid Targets Passenger Transport Sector
Feb 18, 2026 by
CPI
FTC Moves to Bring Back Rules To Make It Easier for Consumers to Cancel Subscriptions
Feb 18, 2026 by
CPI
California Lawmaker Backs Sweeping Antitrust Overhaul
Feb 18, 2026 by
CPI
Brazil’s Competition Authority Probes Microsoft’s Jumpstart Program Over Browser Concerns
Feb 18, 2026 by
CPI
The Battle Between CFTC and State Regulators Over Prediction Markets Spreads to Capitol Hill
Feb 18, 2026 by
CPI
Antitrust Mix by CPI
Antitrust Chronicle® – Hub-&-Spoke Conspiracies
Jan 26, 2026 by
CPI
A Data Analytics Company as the Hub in a Hub-and-Spoke Cartel
Jan 26, 2026 by
Joseph Harrington
Hub and Spoke Cartels
Jan 26, 2026 by
Patrick Van Cayseele
Hub-and-Spoke Collusion or Vertical Exclusion? Identifying the Rim in Hub-and-Spoke Conspiracies
Jan 26, 2026 by
Rosa Abrantes-Metz, Pedro Gonzaga, Laura Ildefonso & Albert Metz
The Algorithmic Middleman in a Hub-and-Spoke Conspiracy: Divergent Court Decisions and the Expanding Patchwork of State and Local Regulations
Jan 26, 2026 by
Bradley C. Weber