Amelia Fletcher, Apr 19, 2007
Over the past few years, there has been a burgeoning literature on two-sided markets and economic understanding of such markets has improved hugely. Less attention has, however, been paid to how competition policy should be applied in two-sided markets. This short note does not attempt to provide a comprehensive analysis of this issue, but merely presents a brief comment on the implications of two-sided market theory for one possible abuse of a dominant position under Article 82 of the EC Treaty: predatory pricing.
Featured News
Republican State Attorneys General Urge Federal Review of Union Pacific–Norfolk Southern Merger
Feb 17, 2026 by
CPI
Redfin and Zillow Press Court to Dismiss FTC Antitrust Suit
Feb 17, 2026 by
CPI
European Commission Launches DSA Investigation into Shein Over Illegal Products
Feb 17, 2026 by
CPI
British Government Vows Changes to Toughen Children’s Online Safety Laws
Feb 17, 2026 by
CPI
Warner Bros Discovery Gives Paramount One Week to Improve $30-Per-Share Bid as Netflix Deal Advances
Feb 17, 2026 by
CPI
Antitrust Mix by CPI
Antitrust Chronicle® – Hub-&-Spoke Conspiracies
Jan 26, 2026 by
CPI
A Data Analytics Company as the Hub in a Hub-and-Spoke Cartel
Jan 26, 2026 by
Joseph Harrington
Hub and Spoke Cartels
Jan 26, 2026 by
Patrick Van Cayseele
Hub-and-Spoke Collusion or Vertical Exclusion? Identifying the Rim in Hub-and-Spoke Conspiracies
Jan 26, 2026 by
Rosa Abrantes-Metz, Pedro Gonzaga, Laura Ildefonso & Albert Metz
The Algorithmic Middleman in a Hub-and-Spoke Conspiracy: Divergent Court Decisions and the Expanding Patchwork of State and Local Regulations
Jan 26, 2026 by
Bradley C. Weber