The Federal Trade Commission (FTC) Chair Lina Khan recently spoke at the Economic Club of New York on Monday to discuss her agency’s policy on consumer protection and ensuring a fair and transparent marketplace. According to Bloomberg, Khan was joined by former White House Budget Director Peter Orszag, and she addressed a diverse group of topics from merger oversight to competition, and the FTC’s primary responsibility of safeguarding competition.
At the heart of the discussion was the agency’s stance on consolidation and monopoly power. Khan highlighted the agency’s progressive approach to antitrust enforcement citing the statutes that, “don’t prohibit being a monopoly, they only prohibit becoming a monopoly through illegal tactics,” and she explained that the FTC looks at mergers through a paradigm of competition. Regarding the new guidelines for mergers, Khan stated that considerations for the impact of competition for labor, and the negative impact of a series of mergers on competition, must be taken into account.
Of course, the new guidance has its fair share of critics, with the U.S. Chamber of Commerce business group Executive Vice President and Chief Policy Officer Neil Bradley expressing his disapproval. Bradley argued that these guidelines are designed to chill merger activity which would “deny smaller companies access to the capital and expertise they need to grow and place U.S. businesses at a disadvantage with their global competitors.”
Read more: Justice Department And FTC Propose Stricter Guidelines For Big Tech Mergers
In response, Khan defended her agency’s record in court. She remarked that out of the thirteen to twenty cases brought up, the FTC has only lost two, claiming that “in the scheme of our merger enforcement program, losing two is okay.” Khan used the agency’s failed attempt to block Meta’s acquisition of Within Unlimited as an example of a case in which a judge rejected some of the Commission’s assertions.
The FTC Chairwoman furthermore addressed the low morale in her agency due to her critiques of the decisions from prior administrations. Despite the tension, the commission continues to seek the best outlets to facilitate corporate mergers and acquisitions. Khan has recognized the commercial necessity of acquiring these companies, as she further explained, “a lot depends on the circumstances of each case.” Khan also discussed updates to the merger filing form, which look to expedite the FTC’s review process.
In the end, the FTC Chairwoman has defended her agency from criticism and aimed to ensure a fair and transparent marketplace. She and her team task themselves with the task of safeguarding that both the statutes and consumers’ best interests are observed.
Source: Bloomberg
Featured News
Electrolux Fined €44.5 Million in French Antitrust Case
Dec 19, 2024 by
CPI
Indian Antitrust Body Raids Alcohol Giants Amid Price Collusion Probe
Dec 19, 2024 by
CPI
Attorneys Seek $525 Million in Fees in NCAA Settlement Case
Dec 19, 2024 by
CPI
Italy’s Competition Watchdog Ends Investigation into Booking.com
Dec 19, 2024 by
CPI
Minnesota Judge Approves $2.4 Million Hormel Settlement in Antitrust Case
Dec 19, 2024 by
CPI
Antitrust Mix by CPI
Antitrust Chronicle® – CRESSE Insights
Dec 19, 2024 by
CPI
Effective Interoperability in Mobile Ecosystems: EU Competition Law Versus Regulation
Dec 19, 2024 by
Giuseppe Colangelo
The Use of Empirical Evidence in Antitrust: Trends, Challenges, and a Path Forward
Dec 19, 2024 by
Eliana Garces
Some Empirical Evidence on the Role of Presumptions and Evidentiary Standards on Antitrust (Under)Enforcement: Is the EC’s New Communication on Art.102 in the Right Direction?
Dec 19, 2024 by
Yannis Katsoulacos
The EC’s Draft Guidelines on the Application of Article 102 TFEU: An Economic Perspective
Dec 19, 2024 by
Benoit Durand