The proposed sale of United Group’s mobile telephony towers in Bulgaria, Croatia and Slovenia to Saudi telecom infrastructure company Tawal has been met with approval by Bulgaria’s Commission for Protection of Competition (CPC).
The deal, announced in April, would give Tawal 100 percent ownership of United Group’s towers in exchange for 1.22 billion euro in cash, although United Group will remain in control of the infrastructure through a long-term agreement.
Yettel Bulgaria, one of Bulgaria’s three mobile carriers and competitor of United Group’s Vivacom, objected to the deal, arguing that the CPC should postpone the decision until it had ruled on United Group’s ‘de facto and de jure’ acquisition of Bulgarian satellite TV company Bulsatkom without prior notification of the CPC.
Responding to the objection, CPC stated that as the regulator deciding on both deals, it has full access to the relevant information and any ruling done by them would be consistent and without jeopardy.
“The regulator should postpone a decision until it ruled on United Group’s ‘de facto and de jure’ acquisition of Bulgarian satellite TV provider Bulsatkom without prior notification of the CPC,” said Yettel Bulgaria.
“As the regulator ruling on both deals, it had full access to all relevant information and there was no risk that it would issue contradictory rulings in the two cases,” CPC countered.
The CPC ruled to approve the proposed sale, subject to future review regarding the terms of the long-term agreement entered into by United Group and Tawal.
Though the sale has been approved, the future of the telephony towers remains uncertain as the CPC is still reviewing United Group’s acquisition of Bulsatkom, and the outcome of this decision could determine the viability of the ongoing agreement between United Group and Tawal concerning the telephony towers.
Source: Sofia Globe
Featured News
Judge Appoints Law Firms to Lead Consumer Antitrust Litigation Against Apple
Dec 22, 2024 by
CPI
Epic Health Systems Seeks Dismissal of Antitrust Suit Filed by Particle Health
Dec 22, 2024 by
CPI
Qualcomm Secures Partial Victory in Licensing Dispute with Arm, Jury Splits on Key Issues
Dec 22, 2024 by
CPI
Google Proposes Revised Revenue-Sharing Limits Amid Antitrust Battle
Dec 22, 2024 by
CPI
Japan’s Antitrust Authority Expected to Sanction Google Over Monopoly Practices
Dec 22, 2024 by
CPI
Antitrust Mix by CPI
Antitrust Chronicle® – CRESSE Insights
Dec 19, 2024 by
CPI
Effective Interoperability in Mobile Ecosystems: EU Competition Law Versus Regulation
Dec 19, 2024 by
Giuseppe Colangelo
The Use of Empirical Evidence in Antitrust: Trends, Challenges, and a Path Forward
Dec 19, 2024 by
Eliana Garces
Some Empirical Evidence on the Role of Presumptions and Evidentiary Standards on Antitrust (Under)Enforcement: Is the EC’s New Communication on Art.102 in the Right Direction?
Dec 19, 2024 by
Yannis Katsoulacos
The EC’s Draft Guidelines on the Application of Article 102 TFEU: An Economic Perspective
Dec 19, 2024 by
Benoit Durand