The senior EU antitrust official has recently declared that the issue of agreements between companies not to hire each other’s employees must be taken more seriously, in order to ensure competition in the labor market is not being unlawfully restricted.
According to Olivier Guersent, director general at the European Commission’s antitrust unit, the U.S. Justice Department has in recent years conducted enforcement over such agreements, but the same attention has not been given to Europe. Guersent states, “And of course we’re also looking at some practices that used to be less on our radar, like non-poach agreements.”
Lawyers specializing in antitrust law hold that such agreements can be considered detrimental to the workforce, as they limit competition in the labor market. Besides the United States, findings of regulatory infringement of no-poach agreements have also been witnessed in Portugal, France, Spain, Croatia, and other countries.
Related: Fidelity National Settles New York AG’s ‘No-Poach’ Claims
The European Commission is able to impose sanctions with considerable financial penalties against companies that violate antitrust regulations, with fines reaching up to 10% of a company’s global turnover.
The move to regulate the amount of recruitment between companies is seen by many workers as a welcome one, stating that this could help preserve opportunities within the job market.
Antitrust lawyers warn that no-poach deals have the potential to create a market dominated by a few players, which would then be able to dictate wages and prevent professionals from progressing in their career, and the European Commission’s decision to step up enforcement of such agreements gives workers new hope.
Source: Reuters
Featured News
Electrolux Fined €44.5 Million in French Antitrust Case
Dec 19, 2024 by
CPI
Indian Antitrust Body Raids Alcohol Giants Amid Price Collusion Probe
Dec 19, 2024 by
CPI
Attorneys Seek $525 Million in Fees in NCAA Settlement Case
Dec 19, 2024 by
CPI
Italy’s Competition Watchdog Ends Investigation into Booking.com
Dec 19, 2024 by
CPI
Minnesota Judge Approves $2.4 Million Hormel Settlement in Antitrust Case
Dec 19, 2024 by
CPI
Antitrust Mix by CPI
Antitrust Chronicle® – CRESSE Insights
Dec 19, 2024 by
CPI
Effective Interoperability in Mobile Ecosystems: EU Competition Law Versus Regulation
Dec 19, 2024 by
Giuseppe Colangelo
The Use of Empirical Evidence in Antitrust: Trends, Challenges, and a Path Forward
Dec 19, 2024 by
Eliana Garces
Some Empirical Evidence on the Role of Presumptions and Evidentiary Standards on Antitrust (Under)Enforcement: Is the EC’s New Communication on Art.102 in the Right Direction?
Dec 19, 2024 by
Yannis Katsoulacos
The EC’s Draft Guidelines on the Application of Article 102 TFEU: An Economic Perspective
Dec 19, 2024 by
Benoit Durand