Jon Tinter, Vice President of Business Development at Microsoft, took the stand during the U.S. Justice Department’s antitrust trial in Washington, shedding light on the secret negotiations between Microsoft and Apple.
According to Tinter, Microsoft CEO Satya Nadella engaged in talks with Apple’s CEO Tim Cook as they explored the possibility of this groundbreaking partnership.
The proposed deal would have required Microsoft to absorb a substantial financial loss due to the terms negotiated with Apple. However, Microsoft believed that it was a strategic move that would ultimately benefit Bing by increasing its market share and revenue.
Related: Google Says Microsoft Engaging In Anti-Competitive Cloud Practices
This investment would have marked a significant departure from Microsoft’s previous collaboration with Apple, which had only included the use of Bing in Siri and Spotlight from 2013 to 2017.
The core of this potential partnership revolved around the revenue generated from ads linked to user queries, a common practice in search engine deals. Given that Bing was considerably smaller than Google at the time, Microsoft would have had to offer Apple a more substantial share of the revenue than Google typically provided.
Tinter also revealed that Microsoft executives had contemplated how to explain the terms of the deal to shareholders, recognizing its potentially adverse financial impact. Nevertheless, the company saw this as a strategic move to bolster Bing’s presence in the search engine market.
In 2018, Microsoft and Apple revisited discussions about collaborating on search services outside the United States. Microsoft had even developed a detailed “playbook” outlining the investments it would make to enhance its search capabilities, aiming to instill confidence in Apple about making the switch from Google.
The revelation of these behind-the-scenes negotiations between tech giants Microsoft and Apple provides a rare glimpse into the high-stakes competition within the technology industry and the lengths companies are willing to go to challenge the dominance of industry leaders like Google.
Source: Bloomberg
Featured News
Electrolux Fined €44.5 Million in French Antitrust Case
Dec 19, 2024 by
CPI
Indian Antitrust Body Raids Alcohol Giants Amid Price Collusion Probe
Dec 19, 2024 by
CPI
Attorneys Seek $525 Million in Fees in NCAA Settlement Case
Dec 19, 2024 by
CPI
Italy’s Competition Watchdog Ends Investigation into Booking.com
Dec 19, 2024 by
CPI
Minnesota Judge Approves $2.4 Million Hormel Settlement in Antitrust Case
Dec 19, 2024 by
CPI
Antitrust Mix by CPI
Antitrust Chronicle® – CRESSE Insights
Dec 19, 2024 by
CPI
Effective Interoperability in Mobile Ecosystems: EU Competition Law Versus Regulation
Dec 19, 2024 by
Giuseppe Colangelo
The Use of Empirical Evidence in Antitrust: Trends, Challenges, and a Path Forward
Dec 19, 2024 by
Eliana Garces
Some Empirical Evidence on the Role of Presumptions and Evidentiary Standards on Antitrust (Under)Enforcement: Is the EC’s New Communication on Art.102 in the Right Direction?
Dec 19, 2024 by
Yannis Katsoulacos
The EC’s Draft Guidelines on the Application of Article 102 TFEU: An Economic Perspective
Dec 19, 2024 by
Benoit Durand