The Dutch competition watchdog, ACM (Authority for Consumers and Markets), announced on Monday that it has dismissed Apple’s objections to the 50 million euros ($53 million) in fines imposed on the tech giant. These fines were issued due to Apple’s failure to comply with orders aimed at curbing the dominant position of the Apple App Store in the Netherlands.
In 2021, the ACM ruled that Apple had violated Dutch competition laws within the dating app market. As a result, they required Apple to permit developers of dating apps to utilize third-party payment processors, reported Reuters.
The authority levied a fine of 5 million euros per week, ultimately accumulating to 50 million euros during the period in which Apple failed to adhere to the directives.
Related: Dutch Regulator Still Unsatisfied With Apple’s Rules
While Apple did raise objections to these fines, disputing the regulator’s definition of relevant markets and disputing the extent of Apple’s dominance in the dating app market, ACM has rejected all of Apple’s contentions. The regulator’s decision, dated July 13, 2023, was made public on Monday.
Apple issued a response, stating, “We disagree with the ACM’s original order, which degrades investment incentives and is not in the best interests of our users’ privacy or data security. As the ACM has denied our administrative appeal, we will appeal to the Netherlands courts.”
ACM has also indicated that it will disclose the undisclosed portion of the proceedings objected to by Apple if the case proceeds to court. This ongoing dispute highlights the growing tensions between tech giants and regulatory bodies over issues of market dominance and competition.
For now, the battle between Apple and Dutch regulators is far from over, and it remains to be seen how the Dutch courts will adjudicate this high-stakes case.
Source: Reuters
Featured News
Malaysia Grants Licenses to WeChat and TikTok Under New Social Media Law
Jan 2, 2025 by
CPI
Axinn Announces Promotions of Antitrust Experts
Jan 2, 2025 by
CPI
Federal Competition Office to Scrutinize High Electricity Prices in Germany
Jan 2, 2025 by
CPI
Mexican Lawmakers Advance Controversial Plan to Dissolve Independent Oversight Bodies
Jan 2, 2025 by
CPI
Motorola Accuses UK of Antitrust Breach Over Terminated Emergency Services Contract
Jan 2, 2025 by
CPI
Antitrust Mix by CPI
Antitrust Chronicle® – CRESSE Insights
Dec 19, 2024 by
CPI
Effective Interoperability in Mobile Ecosystems: EU Competition Law Versus Regulation
Dec 19, 2024 by
Giuseppe Colangelo
The Use of Empirical Evidence in Antitrust: Trends, Challenges, and a Path Forward
Dec 19, 2024 by
Eliana Garces
Some Empirical Evidence on the Role of Presumptions and Evidentiary Standards on Antitrust (Under)Enforcement: Is the EC’s New Communication on Art.102 in the Right Direction?
Dec 19, 2024 by
Yannis Katsoulacos
The EC’s Draft Guidelines on the Application of Article 102 TFEU: An Economic Perspective
Dec 19, 2024 by
Benoit Durand