Amazon is facing scrutiny after the Federal Trade Commission (FTC) revealed the existence of a secret algorithm, known as “Project Nessie,” that the e-commerce giant allegedly used to manipulate prices. The FTC has included these allegations in its monopoly lawsuit against Amazon, claiming that the algorithm aimed to test the elasticity of price increases and observe if competitors would follow suit, reported The Verge.
According to the Wall Street Journal, the algorithm, which is no longer in use, played a significant role in enhancing Amazon’s profits across various product categories. It was so effective that it not only boosted Amazon’s margins but also led competitors to inflate their prices. In cases where rivals didn’t match Amazon’s prices, Project Nessie would revert the prices to their original points.
The algorithm was not limited to raising prices; it also played a role in a promotional spiral. When competitors like Target Corp (TGT) offered discounts, Amazon would match these lower prices. However, even after the competitors’ sales ended, Amazon and others remained at reduced prices, locked in a cycle of low pricing. This algorithm had the power to inflate and deflate prices depending on the market scenario.
Related: FTC Prepares Possible Antitrust Suit Against Amazon
While the exact figures have not been disclosed by the FTC, it is indicated that Project Nessie “extracted” a significant amount from American households and generated an undisclosed amount of “excess profit” for Amazon. The algorithm reportedly contributed over $1 billion in revenue for the e-commerce giant. However, the specifics remain under wraps as Amazon and the FTC continue their legal battle.
Amazon ceased using Project Nessie in 2019, although the reasons for its discontinuation remain unclear. The company’s top lawyer, David Zapolsky, has rebutted the FTC’s claims, arguing that the regulatory body misunderstands the dynamics of online pricing and competition. Zapolsky asserts that halting Amazon’s pricing strategies, as sought by the FTC, would be “anticompetitive and anti-consumer.”
The FTC’s lawsuit against Amazon is part of a larger narrative of regulatory bodies scrutinizing tech giants for alleged anticompetitive practices. Companies like Apple Inc (AAPL) and Microsoft have also faced similar challenges.
In response to the allegations, Amazon’s spokesperson stated, “The FTC was wrong on the facts and the law, and we look forward to making that case in court.”
This news comes as regulatory bodies continue to investigate and challenge the practices of major tech companies. The FTC’s complaint against Amazon highlights the company’s alleged use of various methods to maintain its market dominance, including burying listings to deter sellers from offering lower prices on competing platforms.
The FTC spokesperson, Douglas Farrar, called on Amazon to remove the redactions in the complaint, allowing the public to see the full scope of the alleged illegal monopolistic practices.
Source: The Verge
Featured News
Electrolux Fined €44.5 Million in French Antitrust Case
Dec 19, 2024 by
CPI
Indian Antitrust Body Raids Alcohol Giants Amid Price Collusion Probe
Dec 19, 2024 by
CPI
Attorneys Seek $525 Million in Fees in NCAA Settlement Case
Dec 19, 2024 by
CPI
Italy’s Competition Watchdog Ends Investigation into Booking.com
Dec 19, 2024 by
CPI
Minnesota Judge Approves $2.4 Million Hormel Settlement in Antitrust Case
Dec 19, 2024 by
CPI
Antitrust Mix by CPI
Antitrust Chronicle® – CRESSE Insights
Dec 19, 2024 by
CPI
Effective Interoperability in Mobile Ecosystems: EU Competition Law Versus Regulation
Dec 19, 2024 by
Giuseppe Colangelo
The Use of Empirical Evidence in Antitrust: Trends, Challenges, and a Path Forward
Dec 19, 2024 by
Eliana Garces
Some Empirical Evidence on the Role of Presumptions and Evidentiary Standards on Antitrust (Under)Enforcement: Is the EC’s New Communication on Art.102 in the Right Direction?
Dec 19, 2024 by
Yannis Katsoulacos
The EC’s Draft Guidelines on the Application of Article 102 TFEU: An Economic Perspective
Dec 19, 2024 by
Benoit Durand