In a concerted effort to challenge Major League Baseball’s long-standing antitrust immunity, a bipartisan coalition of 18 state attorneys general, led by Connecticut Attorney General William Tong, has urged the Supreme Court to reconsider the exemption’s impact on competition.
The move was announced on Monday when the attorneys general, representing states including Virginia, Indiana, Arizona, New York, and New Jersey, filed an amicus brief in support of ending the baseball antitrust exemption, reported Bloomberg.
Attorney General William Tong emphasized, “There’s no rational reason why baseball—above any other sport, or any other business—should be insulated from federal and state antitrust enforcement. It’s time to reconsider and overturn the antiquated and unfair baseball antitrust exemption.”
Read more: ‘Moneyball Act’ Targets MLB’s Antitrust Exemption
This state-level initiative complements the efforts of four U.S. lawmakers who also called upon the Supreme Court to eliminate MLB’s antitrust immunity. Senators Mike Lee (R-Utah) and Marco Rubio (R-Fla.), along with Representatives Paul Tonko (D-N.Y.) and Joe Courtney (D-Conn.), submitted an amicus brief on Friday, urging the Supreme Court to grant the petition of a group of baseball teams.
These teams, including the Tri-City ValleyCats in upstate New York, contend that MLB violated antitrust laws by restructuring its century-old farm system, leading to their ousting from MLB’s minor league affiliates.
The lawmakers’ brief underscores the need to end the “legally unsound” immunity and highlights the Supreme Court’s reluctance to alter antitrust sports exemptions in the past. They point out that the Court has refrained from applying such exemptions to other major sports leagues, like the National Football League and the National Basketball Association, emphasizing that baseball should not be held to a different standard and asserting that it significantly impacts interstate commerce.
Source: Bloomberg Law
Featured News
Malaysia Grants Licenses to WeChat and TikTok Under New Social Media Law
Jan 2, 2025 by
CPI
Axinn Announces Promotions of Antitrust Experts
Jan 2, 2025 by
CPI
Federal Competition Office to Scrutinize High Electricity Prices in Germany
Jan 2, 2025 by
CPI
Mexican Lawmakers Advance Controversial Plan to Dissolve Independent Oversight Bodies
Jan 2, 2025 by
CPI
Motorola Accuses UK of Antitrust Breach Over Terminated Emergency Services Contract
Jan 2, 2025 by
CPI
Antitrust Mix by CPI
Antitrust Chronicle® – CRESSE Insights
Dec 19, 2024 by
CPI
Effective Interoperability in Mobile Ecosystems: EU Competition Law Versus Regulation
Dec 19, 2024 by
Giuseppe Colangelo
The Use of Empirical Evidence in Antitrust: Trends, Challenges, and a Path Forward
Dec 19, 2024 by
Eliana Garces
Some Empirical Evidence on the Role of Presumptions and Evidentiary Standards on Antitrust (Under)Enforcement: Is the EC’s New Communication on Art.102 in the Right Direction?
Dec 19, 2024 by
Yannis Katsoulacos
The EC’s Draft Guidelines on the Application of Article 102 TFEU: An Economic Perspective
Dec 19, 2024 by
Benoit Durand