Canada has officially prohibited the use of WeChat, a popular Chinese messaging application, and Kaspersky, the Russian antivirus program, on government-issued mobile devices. This decision comes in light of perceived privacy and security risks. However, Canadian authorities clarified that there has been no compromise of government information as a result of these applications, reported Reuters.
The ban was declared following an extensive evaluation by Canada’s chief information officer, who found that both WeChat, owned by Tencent, and Kaspersky, developed by Moscow-based Kaspersky Lab, posed an “unacceptable level of risk to privacy and security.” The Treasury Board of Canada, responsible for overseeing public administration, released an official statement regarding this ban.
China’s foreign ministry swiftly responded to the decision, accusing the Canadian government of imposing restrictions on Chinese businesses without concrete evidence. They alleged that the ban was justified under the guise of data security, a move they deemed a broad interpretation of national security. The Chinese ministry further expressed concern that these actions overstepped national authority and unreasonably suppressed the activities of businesses from specific countries.
Wang Wenbin, a spokesperson for China’s foreign ministry, stated in a regular press briefing on Tuesday, “We hope that the Canadian side will discard ideological prejudices, abide by the principles of the market economy, and provide a fair, just, and non-discriminatory business environment for Chinese enterprises.”
Kaspersky Lab, on the other hand, expressed surprise and disappointment at the Canadian decision. The company claimed that the ban had been enacted without prior warning and without allowing them the opportunity to address the government’s concerns. They emphasized the absence of any concrete evidence or due process to substantiate the ban.
In an official statement, Kaspersky stated, “As there has been no evidence or due process to otherwise justify these actions, they are highly unsupported and a response to the geopolitical climate rather than a comprehensive evaluation of the integrity of Kaspersky’s products and services.”
Source: Reuters
Featured News
Electrolux Fined €44.5 Million in French Antitrust Case
Dec 19, 2024 by
CPI
Indian Antitrust Body Raids Alcohol Giants Amid Price Collusion Probe
Dec 19, 2024 by
CPI
Attorneys Seek $525 Million in Fees in NCAA Settlement Case
Dec 19, 2024 by
CPI
Italy’s Competition Watchdog Ends Investigation into Booking.com
Dec 19, 2024 by
CPI
Minnesota Judge Approves $2.4 Million Hormel Settlement in Antitrust Case
Dec 19, 2024 by
CPI
Antitrust Mix by CPI
Antitrust Chronicle® – CRESSE Insights
Dec 19, 2024 by
CPI
Effective Interoperability in Mobile Ecosystems: EU Competition Law Versus Regulation
Dec 19, 2024 by
Giuseppe Colangelo
The Use of Empirical Evidence in Antitrust: Trends, Challenges, and a Path Forward
Dec 19, 2024 by
Eliana Garces
Some Empirical Evidence on the Role of Presumptions and Evidentiary Standards on Antitrust (Under)Enforcement: Is the EC’s New Communication on Art.102 in the Right Direction?
Dec 19, 2024 by
Yannis Katsoulacos
The EC’s Draft Guidelines on the Application of Article 102 TFEU: An Economic Perspective
Dec 19, 2024 by
Benoit Durand