Google’s AI chatbot, known as “Bard,” has expressed support for the U.S. Department of Justice (DOJ) in the ongoing antitrust trial against Google, reported The New York Post.
The chatbot, described as a “large language model” trained on extensive internet data, criticized Google for allegedly wielding illegal “monopoly power” that has had a detrimental impact on consumers. This analysis was conducted by The Washington Post.
The analysis involved questioning Bard about over 700 words extracted directly from the DOJ attorney Kenneth Dintzer’s opening statement on September 12. In this statement, Dintzer outlined the government’s case for why Google’s dominance in the online search market should be challenged and potentially dismantled.
Read more: Alphabet’s AI Chatbot Bard Launches In Europe
When asked whether it agreed or disagreed with the DOJ’s arguments, Bard aligned itself with the federal prosecutors, stating that the evidence presented by the U.S. government clearly demonstrates that Google has “illegally used its monopoly power to maintain its dominance in the online search market.”
Bard, which has faced recent controversies for inaccuracies in its statements, responded to a query last week by asserting that Google’s “lack of innovation has led to lower quality search results for users.”
“I believe that the Justice Department should prevail in this case,” Bard declared. “If Google is found to have violated antitrust laws, the court should order Google to change its business practices and make it easier for other search engines to compete. This would lead to more competition in the online search market and lower prices for consumers.”
Source: NY Post
Featured News
Electrolux Fined €44.5 Million in French Antitrust Case
Dec 19, 2024 by
CPI
Indian Antitrust Body Raids Alcohol Giants Amid Price Collusion Probe
Dec 19, 2024 by
CPI
Attorneys Seek $525 Million in Fees in NCAA Settlement Case
Dec 19, 2024 by
CPI
Italy’s Competition Watchdog Ends Investigation into Booking.com
Dec 19, 2024 by
CPI
Minnesota Judge Approves $2.4 Million Hormel Settlement in Antitrust Case
Dec 19, 2024 by
CPI
Antitrust Mix by CPI
Antitrust Chronicle® – CRESSE Insights
Dec 19, 2024 by
CPI
Effective Interoperability in Mobile Ecosystems: EU Competition Law Versus Regulation
Dec 19, 2024 by
Giuseppe Colangelo
The Use of Empirical Evidence in Antitrust: Trends, Challenges, and a Path Forward
Dec 19, 2024 by
Eliana Garces
Some Empirical Evidence on the Role of Presumptions and Evidentiary Standards on Antitrust (Under)Enforcement: Is the EC’s New Communication on Art.102 in the Right Direction?
Dec 19, 2024 by
Yannis Katsoulacos
The EC’s Draft Guidelines on the Application of Article 102 TFEU: An Economic Perspective
Dec 19, 2024 by
Benoit Durand