Athletes Granted Class Action Status in Suit Against NCAA with Potential $4.5 Billion Damages
In a groundbreaking legal development, college athletes have achieved class action status in their lawsuit against the National Collegiate Athletic Association (NCAA), alleging a denial of compensation for the use of their likenesses. This decision could leave the NCAA and its member conferences facing potential damages of up to $4.5 billion.
US District Judge Claudia Wilken, presiding over the case in the Northern District of California, granted class status to more than 184,000 college athletes spanning various categories. This ruling signifies a significant step forward for the case, allowing it to proceed. The lawsuit, initiated by Division I student-athletes Grant House and Sedona Prince in 2020, targets the NCAA and its prominent conferences, reported Bloomberg.
Read more: NCAA Calls $1.3 Billion Antitrust Lawsuit Speculative
The class-action status granted on Friday extends the possibility of damages to thousands of Power Five athletes dating back to 2016. Judge Wilken expressed her support for the athletes’ claim that their Name, Image, and Likeness (NIL) in broadcasts holds substantial value, estimated at least ten percent of the revenues generated from the broadcasting contracts held by the defendants.
The implications of this decision extend beyond the monetary aspect. More than 6,000 football and men’s basketball players could potentially be entitled to a share of television-rights revenue, while an additional 7,000 athletes in various other sports may seek damages related to their social media earnings. To determine the outcome, a jury trial is set for January 2025.
Source: News Bloomberg Law
Featured News
Judge Appoints Law Firms to Lead Consumer Antitrust Litigation Against Apple
Dec 22, 2024 by
CPI
Epic Health Systems Seeks Dismissal of Antitrust Suit Filed by Particle Health
Dec 22, 2024 by
CPI
Qualcomm Secures Partial Victory in Licensing Dispute with Arm, Jury Splits on Key Issues
Dec 22, 2024 by
CPI
Google Proposes Revised Revenue-Sharing Limits Amid Antitrust Battle
Dec 22, 2024 by
CPI
Japan’s Antitrust Authority Expected to Sanction Google Over Monopoly Practices
Dec 22, 2024 by
CPI
Antitrust Mix by CPI
Antitrust Chronicle® – CRESSE Insights
Dec 19, 2024 by
CPI
Effective Interoperability in Mobile Ecosystems: EU Competition Law Versus Regulation
Dec 19, 2024 by
Giuseppe Colangelo
The Use of Empirical Evidence in Antitrust: Trends, Challenges, and a Path Forward
Dec 19, 2024 by
Eliana Garces
Some Empirical Evidence on the Role of Presumptions and Evidentiary Standards on Antitrust (Under)Enforcement: Is the EC’s New Communication on Art.102 in the Right Direction?
Dec 19, 2024 by
Yannis Katsoulacos
The EC’s Draft Guidelines on the Application of Article 102 TFEU: An Economic Perspective
Dec 19, 2024 by
Benoit Durand