In response to widespread criticism following its handling of the Microsoft-Activision Blizzard mega-merger, Britain’s antitrust regulator, the Competition and Markets Authority (CMA), announced plans to refine its merger assessment regime. The proposed changes aim to enhance communication with involved parties and facilitate earlier discussions on potential remedies.
The CMA, having assumed a prominent role among global regulators after Britain’s departure from the European Union in 2020, gained authority over major mergers such as Microsoft’s monumental $69 billion acquisition of the renowned ‘Game of Duty’ maker, Activision, reported Reuters.
In a move that surprised many, the CMA initially blocked the Microsoft-Activision deal, prompting dissatisfaction from the U.S. tech giant and the gaming industry titan. Subsequently, the regulator deviated from its own established protocols, reopening and eventually approving the case after Microsoft introduced modifications.
One of the key criticisms from Microsoft and Activision centered on the lack of clarity in the CMA’s objections during the initial stages of interaction. Responding to these concerns, CMA panel chair Martin Coleman outlined the proposed changes to the merger assessment process.
Read more: UK’s CMA Increasingly Hostile to Business, Says INEOS Chair
Under the forthcoming adjustments, merging parties will gain an opportunity to present their viewpoints after reviewing the full case in an interim report. Coleman emphasized, “The hearing will give the group members an opportunity to question the merger partners as now, but it will also allow more time for the parties to make submissions and for the adoption of a more discursive approach.”
Crucially, the proposed modifications also include a provision for early-stage discussions on potential remedies. Throughout the merger review process, parties will be encouraged to engage with the CMA to explore possible solutions even before reaching the second phase, where remedies, including blockages or divestments, are typically examined.
Britain’s current merger review process comprises two stages: an initial phase to assess the potential impact on competition and a subsequent, more extended second phase focusing on remedies.
The CMA’s proactive response to criticism reflects a commitment to refining its practices and ensuring a more transparent and collaborative approach to mega-merger assessments. As the regulatory landscape evolves, stakeholders will closely monitor the implementation of these proposed changes and their impact on future high-profile mergers.
Source: Reuters
Featured News
Electrolux Fined €44.5 Million in French Antitrust Case
Dec 19, 2024 by
CPI
Indian Antitrust Body Raids Alcohol Giants Amid Price Collusion Probe
Dec 19, 2024 by
CPI
Attorneys Seek $525 Million in Fees in NCAA Settlement Case
Dec 19, 2024 by
CPI
Italy’s Competition Watchdog Ends Investigation into Booking.com
Dec 19, 2024 by
CPI
Minnesota Judge Approves $2.4 Million Hormel Settlement in Antitrust Case
Dec 19, 2024 by
CPI
Antitrust Mix by CPI
Antitrust Chronicle® – CRESSE Insights
Dec 19, 2024 by
CPI
Effective Interoperability in Mobile Ecosystems: EU Competition Law Versus Regulation
Dec 19, 2024 by
Giuseppe Colangelo
The Use of Empirical Evidence in Antitrust: Trends, Challenges, and a Path Forward
Dec 19, 2024 by
Eliana Garces
Some Empirical Evidence on the Role of Presumptions and Evidentiary Standards on Antitrust (Under)Enforcement: Is the EC’s New Communication on Art.102 in the Right Direction?
Dec 19, 2024 by
Yannis Katsoulacos
The EC’s Draft Guidelines on the Application of Article 102 TFEU: An Economic Perspective
Dec 19, 2024 by
Benoit Durand