German online takeaway food company Delivery Hero (DHER.DE) and its Spanish counterpart Glovo faced a second round of raids on Tuesday, as European Union (EU) antitrust regulators escalated their investigation into hiring practices and information sharing.
The European Commission, in a statement, revealed that the latest raids, conducted in two EU countries, were an extension of the ones carried out in July of the preceding year. However, the commission did not disclose the names of the firms involved or specify the countries where the raids occurred, reported Reuters.
The scope of the investigation, initially focused on alleged market allocations, has now broadened to include additional concerns related to alleged “no-poach” agreements and exchanges of commercially sensitive information. “No-poach” agreements, which involve companies refraining from hiring each other’s staff or imposing restrictions on workers providing services on rival platforms, have recently become a focal point of regulatory scrutiny on both sides of the Atlantic. Such agreements are perceived as potential hindrances to fair competition within labor markets.
Related: Delivery Hero’s Glovo Fined $78M By Spain Regulator
Both Delivery Hero and Glovo confirmed the EU raids in separate statements.
Delivery Hero stated, “We can confirm that the European Commission has conducted an inspection at our offices in Berlin and Barcelona.” Meanwhile, Glovo acknowledged that the raids took place at its Barcelona offices.
The intensified investigation signals a growing concern within the EU regarding potential anticompetitive practices in the online takeaway food industry. As the antitrust regulators delve deeper into hiring practices and information sharing, the outcome of the probe could have far-reaching implications for the industry and may lead to increased scrutiny of similar practices across other sectors.
The companies under investigation, Delivery Hero and Glovo, operate in multiple countries and have a significant presence in the online food delivery market.
Source: Reuters
Featured News
Judge Appoints Law Firms to Lead Consumer Antitrust Litigation Against Apple
Dec 22, 2024 by
CPI
Epic Health Systems Seeks Dismissal of Antitrust Suit Filed by Particle Health
Dec 22, 2024 by
CPI
Qualcomm Secures Partial Victory in Licensing Dispute with Arm, Jury Splits on Key Issues
Dec 22, 2024 by
CPI
Google Proposes Revised Revenue-Sharing Limits Amid Antitrust Battle
Dec 22, 2024 by
CPI
Japan’s Antitrust Authority Expected to Sanction Google Over Monopoly Practices
Dec 22, 2024 by
CPI
Antitrust Mix by CPI
Antitrust Chronicle® – CRESSE Insights
Dec 19, 2024 by
CPI
Effective Interoperability in Mobile Ecosystems: EU Competition Law Versus Regulation
Dec 19, 2024 by
Giuseppe Colangelo
The Use of Empirical Evidence in Antitrust: Trends, Challenges, and a Path Forward
Dec 19, 2024 by
Eliana Garces
Some Empirical Evidence on the Role of Presumptions and Evidentiary Standards on Antitrust (Under)Enforcement: Is the EC’s New Communication on Art.102 in the Right Direction?
Dec 19, 2024 by
Yannis Katsoulacos
The EC’s Draft Guidelines on the Application of Article 102 TFEU: An Economic Perspective
Dec 19, 2024 by
Benoit Durand