In a stern warning to the West, President Vladimir Putin declared on Friday that the global community must not allow a monopoly to form in the realm of artificial intelligence (AI). Asserting Russia’s commitment to a more ambitious strategy for AI development, Putin highlighted the need for a balanced landscape in the evolving AI domain.
Acknowledging China and the United States as frontrunners in AI innovation, a sentiment echoed by numerous researchers and world leaders, Putin stressed Russia’s determination to emerge as a significant player in the AI arena. However, the country has faced setbacks, with the conflict in Ukraine prompting an exodus of talented specialists and Western sanctions hindering Russia’s access to crucial high-tech imports.
Addressing an AI conference in Moscow alongside Sberbank CEO German Gref, Putin underscored the impossibility of outright bans on AI, recognizing the potential consequences of restricting such transformative technologies. “You cannot ban something – if we ban it, then it will develop somewhere else, and we will fall behind,” Putin asserted, emphasizing the need for a nuanced approach to the ethical and social implications of AI development.
Related: Russia’s Yandex Opens Public Access To AI
Despite the challenges, Putin expressed confidence that Russia could navigate the ethical dimensions of AI by drawing upon its “traditional” cultural values. He called for a resolution to ethical questions that align with Russia’s cultural heritage.
In a notable critique, Putin cautioned against the biases of some Western online search systems and generative models, accusing them of neglecting or actively canceling out Russian language and culture. According to Putin, these algorithms essentially deny Russia’s existence. This critique adds a geopolitical dimension to the ongoing discourse on AI ethics, highlighting concerns of cultural bias and exclusion.
Source: Reuters
Featured News
Judge Appoints Law Firms to Lead Consumer Antitrust Litigation Against Apple
Dec 22, 2024 by
CPI
Epic Health Systems Seeks Dismissal of Antitrust Suit Filed by Particle Health
Dec 22, 2024 by
CPI
Qualcomm Secures Partial Victory in Licensing Dispute with Arm, Jury Splits on Key Issues
Dec 22, 2024 by
CPI
Google Proposes Revised Revenue-Sharing Limits Amid Antitrust Battle
Dec 22, 2024 by
CPI
Japan’s Antitrust Authority Expected to Sanction Google Over Monopoly Practices
Dec 22, 2024 by
CPI
Antitrust Mix by CPI
Antitrust Chronicle® – CRESSE Insights
Dec 19, 2024 by
CPI
Effective Interoperability in Mobile Ecosystems: EU Competition Law Versus Regulation
Dec 19, 2024 by
Giuseppe Colangelo
The Use of Empirical Evidence in Antitrust: Trends, Challenges, and a Path Forward
Dec 19, 2024 by
Eliana Garces
Some Empirical Evidence on the Role of Presumptions and Evidentiary Standards on Antitrust (Under)Enforcement: Is the EC’s New Communication on Art.102 in the Right Direction?
Dec 19, 2024 by
Yannis Katsoulacos
The EC’s Draft Guidelines on the Application of Article 102 TFEU: An Economic Perspective
Dec 19, 2024 by
Benoit Durand