According to The Wall Street Journal, the regulatory body has requested additional information from both Exxon Mobil and Pioneer as part of its standard procedure to assess the potential anticompetitive implications of the merger under U.S. law. Pioneer Natural Resources disclosed this development in a filing on Tuesday, shedding light on the ongoing scrutiny of the landmark deal.
Merger investigations of this magnitude typically take around 10 months to complete, as indicated by data compiled by law firm Dechert. The FTC, in conjunction with the Justice Department, holds the authority to either file a lawsuit to block the merger or give its clearance, effectively allowing the deal to proceed. In some instances, companies opt to cancel proposed mergers when they become aware of impending antitrust actions.
Exxon Mobil’s October proposal to acquire Pioneer in an all-stock deal worth $59.5 billion aims to position Exxon as the leading oil producer in the Permian Basin, encompassing West Texas and New Mexico, which is currently the most active U.S. oil field. If successful, this would mark Exxon’s largest deal since its $75 billion merger with Mobil in the late 1990s.
Related: The Case for an Exxon-Chevron Merger
The oil and gas industry has recently witnessed a series of high-profile acquisitions, prompting speculation about potential antitrust scrutiny from federal regulators. Chevron, in response to Exxon’s move, announced a $53 billion all-stock deal to acquire Hess two weeks later. Additionally, Occidental Petroleum is reportedly in talks to purchase CrownRock, a prominent private oil company in the Permian, for over $10 billion, according to recent reports from The Wall Street Journal.
Despite industry expectations, antitrust regulators have historically been hesitant to intervene in oil producer deals, often adopting a global perspective on the competitive landscape of their products. Investors, anticipating continued consolidation in the sector, are closely watching these developments, with the Permian Basin becoming a focal point for major players seeking to expand their portfolios. As top-tier drilling opportunities become scarcer in the region, selling valuable land has proven to be a more lucrative strategy for executives compared to drilling operations. The outcome of the FTC investigation could have far-reaching implications for the future structure of the oil and gas market.
Source: WSJ
Featured News
Electrolux Fined €44.5 Million in French Antitrust Case
Dec 19, 2024 by
CPI
Indian Antitrust Body Raids Alcohol Giants Amid Price Collusion Probe
Dec 19, 2024 by
CPI
Attorneys Seek $525 Million in Fees in NCAA Settlement Case
Dec 19, 2024 by
CPI
Italy’s Competition Watchdog Ends Investigation into Booking.com
Dec 19, 2024 by
CPI
Minnesota Judge Approves $2.4 Million Hormel Settlement in Antitrust Case
Dec 19, 2024 by
CPI
Antitrust Mix by CPI
Antitrust Chronicle® – CRESSE Insights
Dec 19, 2024 by
CPI
Effective Interoperability in Mobile Ecosystems: EU Competition Law Versus Regulation
Dec 19, 2024 by
Giuseppe Colangelo
The Use of Empirical Evidence in Antitrust: Trends, Challenges, and a Path Forward
Dec 19, 2024 by
Eliana Garces
Some Empirical Evidence on the Role of Presumptions and Evidentiary Standards on Antitrust (Under)Enforcement: Is the EC’s New Communication on Art.102 in the Right Direction?
Dec 19, 2024 by
Yannis Katsoulacos
The EC’s Draft Guidelines on the Application of Article 102 TFEU: An Economic Perspective
Dec 19, 2024 by
Benoit Durand