Google is pushing back against proposed measures by EU antitrust regulators that would require the tech giant to divest part of its adtech business. The company contends that such a move is disproportionate and not in the best interest of its advertising partners. Oliver Bethell, Google’s director, expressed strong opposition to the proposed divestment, highlighting the efficiency and significance of the adtech sector within the company’s operations.
The European Commission accuses Google of abusing its dominance in the online advertising technology industry since 2014. According to the Commission, Google has wielded its market power on both sides of the supply chain, showing favoritism towards its own ad exchange, AdX, in matching auctions. This alleged anticompetitive behavior has drawn regulatory scrutiny, posing potential consequences for Google’s substantial presence in the online advertising landscape.
Read more: Google Appeals €2.4B Antitrust Fine At Top EU Court
In response, Dan Taylor, Google’s vice president for global ads, joined Bethell in contesting the proposed measures. Taylor argued that serving both advertisers and publishers is a common industry practice. He cited competitors such as Amazon, Microsoft, Criteo, and Comcast, all of which operate similar adtech businesses catering to both sides of the market. Taylor emphasized the prevalence of integrated technology stacks, asserting their role in facilitating high-quality connections between advertisers and publishers.
This dispute is of significant importance to Google, as the ad business under scrutiny constituted a staggering 79 percent of the company’s total revenue in the previous year. In 2022, Google’s advertising revenue, spanning various services such as search, Gmail, Google Maps, YouTube, and ad platforms, amounted to an impressive USD 224.5 billion.
The outcome of this antitrust battle could have far-reaching implications not only for Google but also for the broader online advertising industry. As regulatory scrutiny continues, stakeholders will be closely watching developments to see how the tech giant’s defense against the allegations unfolds and whether any potential divestment would reshape the landscape of online advertising in the European market.
Source: Business World
Featured News
Electrolux Fined €44.5 Million in French Antitrust Case
Dec 19, 2024 by
CPI
Indian Antitrust Body Raids Alcohol Giants Amid Price Collusion Probe
Dec 19, 2024 by
CPI
Attorneys Seek $525 Million in Fees in NCAA Settlement Case
Dec 19, 2024 by
CPI
Italy’s Competition Watchdog Ends Investigation into Booking.com
Dec 19, 2024 by
CPI
Minnesota Judge Approves $2.4 Million Hormel Settlement in Antitrust Case
Dec 19, 2024 by
CPI
Antitrust Mix by CPI
Antitrust Chronicle® – CRESSE Insights
Dec 19, 2024 by
CPI
Effective Interoperability in Mobile Ecosystems: EU Competition Law Versus Regulation
Dec 19, 2024 by
Giuseppe Colangelo
The Use of Empirical Evidence in Antitrust: Trends, Challenges, and a Path Forward
Dec 19, 2024 by
Eliana Garces
Some Empirical Evidence on the Role of Presumptions and Evidentiary Standards on Antitrust (Under)Enforcement: Is the EC’s New Communication on Art.102 in the Right Direction?
Dec 19, 2024 by
Yannis Katsoulacos
The EC’s Draft Guidelines on the Application of Article 102 TFEU: An Economic Perspective
Dec 19, 2024 by
Benoit Durand