Google’s Chrome Browser to Test Tracking Protection Feature Ahead of Cookie Phase-Out
Alphabet’s Google has announced plans to roll out a new feature, called Tracking Protection, on its Chrome browser in a bid to eliminate the use of third-party cookies commonly utilized by advertisers for consumer tracking. The tech giant is set to launch the feature on January 4, initially testing it on 1% of Chrome users globally, with a wider implementation anticipated in the second half of 2024.
The move is part of Google’s broader initiative to enhance user privacy by restricting cross-site tracking by default. Third-party cookies are specialized files that enable websites and advertisers to identify individual users and monitor their online browsing activities.
While Google aims to completely phase out third-party cookies by 2024, the timeline is contingent on addressing antitrust concerns raised by the UK’s Competition and Markets Authority (CMA). The CMA has been investigating Google’s plan to discontinue support for certain cookies in Chrome, expressing apprehension that such actions could hinder competition in the digital advertising sector.
Related: UK Watchdog To Probe Google Chrome Changes Over Antitrust Concerns
The European Union antitrust chief, Margrethe Vestager, reiterated in June that investigations into Google’s introduction of tools to block third-party cookies, part of the company’s “Privacy Sandbox” initiative, will persist.
Advertisers have voiced concerns about the potential impact on their ability to collect personalized information for ad targeting in the absence of cookies, particularly within the world’s most widely used browser. Some argue that this shift may make them more reliant on Google’s user databases.
In response to these changes, brokerage BofA Global Research noted in a Thursday statement that the phase-out of cookies could empower media agencies, particularly those capable of providing proprietary insights at scale to advertisers.
As Google proceeds with its plans, the tech giant will likely navigate regulatory scrutiny and industry feedback to strike a balance between enhancing user privacy and addressing concerns within the digital advertising landscape.
Source: KFGO
Featured News
Judge Allows FTC Antitrust Case Against Amazon to Move Forward
Oct 1, 2024 by
CPI
SAP Leader Urges Caution on EU AI Rules, Warns of Competitive Disadvantage
Oct 1, 2024 by
CPI
Colorado’s Grocery Workers Unite to Oppose $24.6 Billion Supermarket Merge
Oct 1, 2024 by
CPI
Canada’s Competition Bureau Warns Businesses of Tougher Enforcement
Oct 1, 2024 by
CPI
Top Antitrust Lawyers Launch New Boutique Firm
Oct 1, 2024 by
CPI
Antitrust Mix by CPI
Antitrust Chronicle® – Refusal to Deal
Sep 27, 2024 by
CPI
Antitrust’s Refusal-to-Deal Doctrine: The Emperor Has No Clothes
Sep 27, 2024 by
Erik Hovenkamp
Why All Antitrust Claims are Refusal to Deal Claims and What that Means for Policy
Sep 27, 2024 by
Ramsi Woodcock
The Aspen Misadventure
Sep 27, 2024 by
Roger Blair & Holly P. Stidham
Refusal to Deal in Antitrust Law: Evolving Jurisprudence and Business Justifications in the Align Technology Case
Sep 27, 2024 by
Timothy Hsieh