China’s Personal Data Law – Legal and Practical Assessment of Compliance Risk
By:
The implementation of the Personal Information Protection Law (“PIPL”) in 2021 establishes a legal framework that regulates the collection of personal information (“PI”) in China, applying to both foreign and domestic companies. The law also governs the cross-border transfer (or export, used interchangeably) of PI and has extraterritorial effects. Foreign companies processing Chinese PI from their home countries are subject to PIPL’s scrutiny, requiring them to either establish an entity in China or designate a Chinese representative. This local entity or representative must comply with PIPL requirements and register with the Cyberspace Administration of China (“CAC”).
Article 38 of PIPL outlines the obligations for companies exporting PI, whether belonging to Chinese or foreign nationals. Companies must choose one of the following options:
a) Successfully undergo a security assessment by CAC. b) Enter into a standard contract with the overseas PI recipient, filing it along with a PI Protection Impact Assessment at the provincial level CAC. c) Obtain certification from an accredited institution.
According to the Measures for Security Assessment of Data Cross-border Transfer, data processors meeting specific criteria, such as those transferring important data, serving as key information infrastructure operators, or handling PI for over 1 million people, must opt for security assessments (Option a). Options b and c are not available for entities meeting these criteria. Additionally, these security assessments apply to data processors exporting PI of over 100,000 subjects or Sensitive PI of over 10,000 subjects since January 1st of the previous year…
Featured News
Judge Appoints Law Firms to Lead Consumer Antitrust Litigation Against Apple
Dec 22, 2024 by
CPI
Epic Health Systems Seeks Dismissal of Antitrust Suit Filed by Particle Health
Dec 22, 2024 by
CPI
Qualcomm Secures Partial Victory in Licensing Dispute with Arm, Jury Splits on Key Issues
Dec 22, 2024 by
CPI
Google Proposes Revised Revenue-Sharing Limits Amid Antitrust Battle
Dec 22, 2024 by
CPI
Japan’s Antitrust Authority Expected to Sanction Google Over Monopoly Practices
Dec 22, 2024 by
CPI
Antitrust Mix by CPI
Antitrust Chronicle® – CRESSE Insights
Dec 19, 2024 by
CPI
Effective Interoperability in Mobile Ecosystems: EU Competition Law Versus Regulation
Dec 19, 2024 by
Giuseppe Colangelo
The Use of Empirical Evidence in Antitrust: Trends, Challenges, and a Path Forward
Dec 19, 2024 by
Eliana Garces
Some Empirical Evidence on the Role of Presumptions and Evidentiary Standards on Antitrust (Under)Enforcement: Is the EC’s New Communication on Art.102 in the Right Direction?
Dec 19, 2024 by
Yannis Katsoulacos
The EC’s Draft Guidelines on the Application of Article 102 TFEU: An Economic Perspective
Dec 19, 2024 by
Benoit Durand