Korea’s FTC Proposes Bill to Curb Monopolistic Practices by Platform Operators
In a move aimed at promoting fair competition and protecting consumers from monopolistic practices, the Fair Trade Commission (FTC) of South Korea has proposed a bill to prevent platform operators from restricting access to competing services. The decision, announced on Tuesday, has stirred opposition from prominent business associations and the tech industry in the country.
The antitrust regulator revealed its intention to introduce the bill following discussions with relevant government agencies. However, the commission did not provide specific details regarding the targets or penalties associated with the proposed regulation.
According to a statement released by the FTC, platform operators have been rapidly expanding their influence in the market through unfair business practices that hinder the entry of startups or alternative platforms. The commission emphasized that such monopolistic practices place a burden on consumers, resulting in increased commission charges or subscription fees.
One high-profile example cited by the FTC involves Google allegedly preventing game publishers from launching games on alternative app markets after releasing them on Google Play Store. This move has reportedly limited competition and stifled the growth of other Android app stores, such as One Store, created by Korea’s three major mobile carriers and tech giant Naver.
Read more: South Korea’s Antitrust Watchdog Probes K-Pop Agencies
Kakao, a major player in the South Korean tech industry, also came under scrutiny. The FTC highlighted Kakao Mobility, a ride-hailing affiliate, for manipulating ride dispatch algorithms to favor its affiliated drivers over others, raising concerns about anti-competitive behavior.
Industry sources suggest that major services operated by Google, Naver, and Kakao could potentially be subject to the proposed bill. The FTC clarified its approach by indicating that it would identify a select group of large-scale platform operators, referred to as “dominant platform operators,” who hold significant influence in the domestic market. These operators would be prohibited from engaging in unfair practices, such as showing preferential treatment to affiliates and preventing multi-homing.
The term “multi-homing” refers to a scenario where users simultaneously connect to multiple platforms, promoting a more diverse and competitive digital landscape.
While the proposed bill aims to foster a fair and competitive market environment, it has faced resistance from business associations and the tech industry. The debate surrounding the bill is expected to intensify as stakeholders evaluate the potential impact on the South Korean digital ecosystem. The FTC, for now, remains committed to addressing concerns related to monopolistic practices and fostering a level playing field for businesses in the tech sector.
Source: Korea Joongang Daily
Featured News
Electrolux Fined €44.5 Million in French Antitrust Case
Dec 19, 2024 by
CPI
Indian Antitrust Body Raids Alcohol Giants Amid Price Collusion Probe
Dec 19, 2024 by
CPI
Attorneys Seek $525 Million in Fees in NCAA Settlement Case
Dec 19, 2024 by
CPI
Italy’s Competition Watchdog Ends Investigation into Booking.com
Dec 19, 2024 by
CPI
Minnesota Judge Approves $2.4 Million Hormel Settlement in Antitrust Case
Dec 19, 2024 by
CPI
Antitrust Mix by CPI
Antitrust Chronicle® – CRESSE Insights
Dec 19, 2024 by
CPI
Effective Interoperability in Mobile Ecosystems: EU Competition Law Versus Regulation
Dec 19, 2024 by
Giuseppe Colangelo
The Use of Empirical Evidence in Antitrust: Trends, Challenges, and a Path Forward
Dec 19, 2024 by
Eliana Garces
Some Empirical Evidence on the Role of Presumptions and Evidentiary Standards on Antitrust (Under)Enforcement: Is the EC’s New Communication on Art.102 in the Right Direction?
Dec 19, 2024 by
Yannis Katsoulacos
The EC’s Draft Guidelines on the Application of Article 102 TFEU: An Economic Perspective
Dec 19, 2024 by
Benoit Durand