Japan Prepares ‘Digital Antitrust Law’ to Challenge Apple and Google App Store Policies
In a significant move to address concerns of monopoly in the mobile market, Japanese authorities are gearing up to introduce a “Digital Antitrust Law,” as reported by Nihon Keizai Shimbun. This new legislation aims to compel tech giants such as Apple and Google to open up their ecosystems by enabling “application sideloading” and allowing “third-party payment” options specifically within the Japanese market.
As of now, Google already permits the sideloading of applications on its Android platform. Consequently, the company might only need to navigate the third-party payment requirement in Japan. On the other hand, Apple, known for its closed iOS system, prohibits the sideloading of apps. Apple’s CEO, Tim Cook, expressed concerns about the potential risks associated with sideloading, emphasizing the difficulty of verifying the source and intentions of such applications.
Read more: Google’s Latest Play Store Suit Gets Class Action Status
The genesis of this impending legislation can be traced back to 2020 when Japanese authorities initiated investigations into antitrust issues involving major tech players, including Apple, Google, Amazon, Meta, and others. This year, regulatory agencies declared the completion of the probe, asserting that “Apple and Google dominate the mobile app platform, creating a monopoly.” Consequently, the Japanese authorities have deemed it imperative to formulate the “Digital Antitrust Law” to address the monopoly concerns.
The proposed law will mandate any company conducting business in the Japanese market to open its app store and third-party payment channels. If the legislation passes, the Japan Fair Trade Commission will wield the authority to impose fines on brands found in violation. The primary objective behind the law is to break the perceived monopoly held by Apple, Google, and other select brands in the Japanese mobile market.
Source: GIZ China
Featured News
Malaysia Grants Licenses to WeChat and TikTok Under New Social Media Law
Jan 2, 2025 by
CPI
Axinn Announces Promotions of Antitrust Experts
Jan 2, 2025 by
CPI
Federal Competition Office to Scrutinize High Electricity Prices in Germany
Jan 2, 2025 by
CPI
Mexican Lawmakers Advance Controversial Plan to Dissolve Independent Oversight Bodies
Jan 2, 2025 by
CPI
Motorola Accuses UK of Antitrust Breach Over Terminated Emergency Services Contract
Jan 2, 2025 by
CPI
Antitrust Mix by CPI
Antitrust Chronicle® – CRESSE Insights
Dec 19, 2024 by
CPI
Effective Interoperability in Mobile Ecosystems: EU Competition Law Versus Regulation
Dec 19, 2024 by
Giuseppe Colangelo
The Use of Empirical Evidence in Antitrust: Trends, Challenges, and a Path Forward
Dec 19, 2024 by
Eliana Garces
Some Empirical Evidence on the Role of Presumptions and Evidentiary Standards on Antitrust (Under)Enforcement: Is the EC’s New Communication on Art.102 in the Right Direction?
Dec 19, 2024 by
Yannis Katsoulacos
The EC’s Draft Guidelines on the Application of Article 102 TFEU: An Economic Perspective
Dec 19, 2024 by
Benoit Durand