US prosecutors announced on Friday night that they do not intend to pursue a second trial against Sam Bankman-Fried, the former billionaire and founder of the now-bankrupt FTX cryptocurrency exchange. Bankman-Fried was convicted last month on all seven fraud and conspiracy counts he faced, accused of looting $8 billion from FTX customers out of sheer greed.
The decision not to conduct a second trial was revealed in a letter filed in federal court in Manhattan. Prosecutors justified their stance by citing the “strong public interest” in a swift resolution of the case against the 31-year-old entrepreneur. They argued that the urgency is particularly significant as Bankman-Fried’s scheduled sentencing on March 28, 2024, is expected to include orders of forfeiture and restitution for victims of his crimes.
Bankman-Fried, led away in handcuffs by Bahamian police in December of the previous year, is facing a dramatic fall from grace. The founder’s ‘unkempt visionary’ persona, once associated with a $26 billion personal fortune, crumbled within a year after FTX filed for bankruptcy.
Related: IRS Targets FTX While US Chamber Of Commerce Backs Coinbase
While the conviction stemmed from the initial seven charges, Bankman-Fried had six additional charges, including campaign finance violations, conspiracy to commit bribery, and conspiracy to operate an unlicensed money transmitting business. These charges were severed from the first trial, leaving the possibility of a trial timetable uncertain as the Bahamas, where FTX was based, had not granted consent for a trial on the remaining charges.
Prosecutors stressed that a second trial would not significantly impact the potential prison time Bankman-Fried could face, as Judge Lewis Kaplan could consider all of the convicted entrepreneur’s conduct when sentencing him. The prosecutors argued that much of the evidence that could be presented in a second trial was already introduced during the initial proceedings.
Bankman-Fried, expected to appeal against his conviction, testified during the trial that he made mistakes in managing FTX but denied stealing customer funds. He also claimed ignorance regarding the precarious financial state of both FTX and his crypto-focused hedge fund Alameda Research.
Source: The Guardian
Featured News
Judge Allows FTC Antitrust Case Against Amazon to Move Forward
Oct 1, 2024 by
CPI
SAP Leader Urges Caution on EU AI Rules, Warns of Competitive Disadvantage
Oct 1, 2024 by
CPI
Colorado’s Grocery Workers Unite to Oppose $24.6 Billion Supermarket Merge
Oct 1, 2024 by
CPI
Canada’s Competition Bureau Warns Businesses of Tougher Enforcement
Oct 1, 2024 by
CPI
Top Antitrust Lawyers Launch New Boutique Firm
Oct 1, 2024 by
CPI
Antitrust Mix by CPI
Antitrust Chronicle® – Refusal to Deal
Sep 27, 2024 by
CPI
Antitrust’s Refusal-to-Deal Doctrine: The Emperor Has No Clothes
Sep 27, 2024 by
Erik Hovenkamp
Why All Antitrust Claims are Refusal to Deal Claims and What that Means for Policy
Sep 27, 2024 by
Ramsi Woodcock
The Aspen Misadventure
Sep 27, 2024 by
Roger Blair & Holly P. Stidham
Refusal to Deal in Antitrust Law: Evolving Jurisprudence and Business Justifications in the Align Technology Case
Sep 27, 2024 by
Timothy Hsieh