Hewlett-Packard (HP) is under legal scrutiny as a group of consumers filed a proposed federal class action on Friday in a Chicago court, accusing the technology giant of antitrust violations and deceptive practices related to its printers’ ink cartridges.
Eleven consumers hailing from various states, including Illinois, New York, and Missouri, allege that HP engaged in anticompetitive behavior by designing its printers to reject replacement ink cartridges from other manufacturers.
According to Reuters, this compelled consumers to pay artificially inflated prices for HP-branded cartridges, creating an environment conducive to monopolizing the replacement ink market.
Related: HP Wins Quanta’s Factories and Patents In Court
The lawsuit contends that HP failed to inform customers that automatic software updates could disable certain printers unless exclusively using HP-branded ink. This alleged lack of transparency resulted in non-functional printers, coercing consumers into purchasing HP-branded ink cartridges that they would not have otherwise chosen.
The legal action builds upon previous or pending cases against HP, accusing the company of deceptive practices concerning its ink cartridges. In 2019, HP reached a settlement in a California case, agreeing to pay $1.5 million to resolve consumer claims. However, the settlement did not require the company to admit any wrongdoing.
Source: Reuters
Featured News
Court Dismisses Monopoly Claims Against Tempur Sealy
Oct 18, 2024 by
CPI
Philadelphia City Council Advances Legislation to Tackle Rent Price-Fixing
Oct 17, 2024 by
CPI
FTC Probes Deere for Potential Anti-Competitive Repair Practices
Oct 17, 2024 by
CPI
Britain’s Ofcom to Outline Strict Guidelines for Tackling Illegal Online Content
Oct 17, 2024 by
CPI
EU Considers Expanding Potential Fines for X, Targeting Musk’s Broader Business Empire
Oct 17, 2024 by
CPI
Antitrust Mix by CPI
Antitrust Chronicle® – Refusal to Deal
Sep 27, 2024 by
CPI
Antitrust’s Refusal-to-Deal Doctrine: The Emperor Has No Clothes
Sep 27, 2024 by
Erik Hovenkamp
Why All Antitrust Claims are Refusal to Deal Claims and What that Means for Policy
Sep 27, 2024 by
Ramsi Woodcock
The Aspen Misadventure
Sep 27, 2024 by
Roger Blair & Holly P. Stidham
Refusal to Deal in Antitrust Law: Evolving Jurisprudence and Business Justifications in the Align Technology Case
Sep 27, 2024 by
Timothy Hsieh