
A US federal judge, James Donato, has given the green light to a $26 million payout to lawyers representing Android software developers involved in a legal battle against Alphabet’s Google. The tech giant had faced accusations of stifling competition within its Play app store.
The approved settlement comes on the heels of a significant victory for the plaintiffs, who managed to secure a $90 million cash settlement from Google. Notable law firms such as Hagens Berman Sobol Shapiro, Sperling & Slater, and Hausfeld are among those set to receive the payout.
As part of the settlement, Google has agreed to maintain a reduced 15% service fee for app developers on their first $1 million in annual revenue until May 2025. Additionally, Google committed to revising its developer distribution agreement.
Read more: Antitrust Suit Against Google Returns To Texas
This legal battle was part of a broader antitrust challenge against Google’s practices in the Play store. In a separate case in December, Google suffered a setback when it lost a jury trial against Epic Games, the creator of “Fortnite.” Epic Games is seeking a court order to overhaul Play store policies. Despite the loss, Google, on Thursday, expressed its intention to request Judge Donato to overturn the verdict or grant a new trial.
In a related development, Google reached a settlement last month with states and consumers, amounting to $700 million. As part of the agreement, Google committed to revamping its Play store. The state and consumer plaintiffs had alleged that Google overcharged them through unnecessary fees and imposed restrictions on the distribution of apps.
Google, however, has consistently denied any wrongdoing. The tech giant did not immediately respond to requests for comment following the recent approval of the settlement in the app developers’ case.
Source: Reuters
Featured News
CFPB Allows Some Operations to Resume Amid Legal Challenge
Mar 6, 2025 by
CPI
NASCAR Accuses Michael Jordan’s Race Team of Illegal Cartel in Legal Battle
Mar 6, 2025 by
CPI
Healthcare Providers Sue BCBS Insurers Over Alleged Collusion
Mar 6, 2025 by
CPI
Indian Distributors File Antitrust Case Against Quick-Delivery Giants
Mar 6, 2025 by
CPI
EU Lawmakers Send Letter Rejecting Claims of Bias in Digital Rules
Mar 6, 2025 by
CPI
Antitrust Mix by CPI
Antitrust Chronicle® – Self-Preferencing
Feb 26, 2025 by
CPI
Platform Self-Preferencing: Focusing the Policy Debate
Feb 26, 2025 by
Michael Katz
Weaponized Opacity: Self-Preferencing in Digital Audience Measurement
Feb 26, 2025 by
Thomas Hoppner & Philipp Westerhoff
Self-Preferencing: An Economic Literature-Based Assessment Advocating a Case-By-Case Approach and Compliance Requirements
Feb 26, 2025 by
Patrice Bougette & Frederic Marty
Self-Preferencing in Adjacent Markets
Feb 26, 2025 by
Muxin Li