US Chamber of Commerce Raises Concerns Over Korea’s Antitrust Regulations on Big Tech
The US Chamber of Commerce has expressed apprehension regarding South Korea’s recent efforts to bolster antitrust regulations targeting Big Tech companies. The move has potential implications for major American tech giants like Google, Meta, and Amazon, as well as domestic players such as Naver and Kakao.
Charles Freeman, Senior Vice President for Asia at the US Chamber of Commerce, voiced the organization’s concerns in a statement released on Monday. Freeman emphasized the need for transparency in the legislative process, stating, “It is critical that the full text of any proposed legislation be made publicly available, and that the government of Korea provide ample opportunity for engagement with a range of stakeholders, including the American business community and the U.S. government.”
Korea’s antitrust authorities are pushing for the implementation of a new rule, tentatively named the Platform Competition Promotion Act, similar to the European Union’s Digital Markets Act. This proposed legislation aims to prevent dominant platform operators, often referred to as “gatekeepers,” from engaging in unfair business practices such as favoring in-house products, cross-selling services with other products, or preventing multi-homing.
Freeman argued that such platform bills are “deeply flawed,” asserting that they put governments in a position where they may violate trade commitments by arbitrarily targeting foreign firms, ultimately hindering market competition.
Read more: South Korea’s Big Tech Regulations Raise National Security Concerns
The European Union defines certain platforms generating over 7.5 billion euros in annual revenue as “gatekeepers” and imposes regulations on their core services in the digital sector.
In response to the concerns raised by the US Chamber of Commerce, Korea’s Fair Trade Commission (KFTC) released a statement on Tuesday, assuring that it would consider opinions from domestic as well as overseas stakeholders, including those from the United States, when finalizing the details of the bill. The KFTC is expected to draft a legislative proposal for the platform bill as early as next month, engaging in discussions with relevant government agencies and stakeholders.
The KFTC highlighted its ongoing collaboration with the American Chamber of Commerce in Korea (AmCham) and disclosed that it had held meetings with the chamber and its members on Jan. 11 and 25. Additionally, the kFTC chairman is set to deliver a presentation on March 7, as per the chamber’s request.
However, in a sign of protest, major platform operators such as Google, Meta, and Apple chose to boycott the latest closed-door meeting, held on Jan. 25 at the chamber’s office in western Seoul.
Source: Korea Joon Gang Daily
Featured News
Judge Appoints Law Firms to Lead Consumer Antitrust Litigation Against Apple
Dec 22, 2024 by
CPI
Epic Health Systems Seeks Dismissal of Antitrust Suit Filed by Particle Health
Dec 22, 2024 by
CPI
Qualcomm Secures Partial Victory in Licensing Dispute with Arm, Jury Splits on Key Issues
Dec 22, 2024 by
CPI
Google Proposes Revised Revenue-Sharing Limits Amid Antitrust Battle
Dec 22, 2024 by
CPI
Japan’s Antitrust Authority Expected to Sanction Google Over Monopoly Practices
Dec 22, 2024 by
CPI
Antitrust Mix by CPI
Antitrust Chronicle® – CRESSE Insights
Dec 19, 2024 by
CPI
Effective Interoperability in Mobile Ecosystems: EU Competition Law Versus Regulation
Dec 19, 2024 by
Giuseppe Colangelo
The Use of Empirical Evidence in Antitrust: Trends, Challenges, and a Path Forward
Dec 19, 2024 by
Eliana Garces
Some Empirical Evidence on the Role of Presumptions and Evidentiary Standards on Antitrust (Under)Enforcement: Is the EC’s New Communication on Art.102 in the Right Direction?
Dec 19, 2024 by
Yannis Katsoulacos
The EC’s Draft Guidelines on the Application of Article 102 TFEU: An Economic Perspective
Dec 19, 2024 by
Benoit Durand