New York Attorney General Letitia James has escalated her lawsuit against Digital Currency Group (DCG) and several other defendants. The lawsuit, initially filed in October, has now been expanded to include allegations of a fraud scheme totaling more than $3 billion, tripling its previous estimate.
The lawsuit originally targeted DCG, along with its Genesis Global Capital unit and Gemini Trust, the cryptocurrency exchange founded by Cameron and Tyler Winklevoss. Attorney General James accused these entities of misleading investors regarding the Gemini Earn program. This program allowed customers to lend their cryptocurrency assets to Genesis in exchange for a promised high rate of return, reported Reuters.
According to James, the defendants’ actions resulted in losses exceeding $1 billion for investors. However, as the investigation progressed and more affected parties stepped forward, it became apparent that the scope of the alleged fraud was much larger than initially anticipated. The attorney general asserted that “the scam perpetrated by DCG through Genesis” had ensnared additional investors who had sent money directly to Genesis, falsely believing their investments were secure.
Related: NY Bill Would Allow Crypto Payments To State Agencies
Among the newly identified victims are numerous retail customers, including individuals like a chiropractor and a stay-at-home father, each of whom allegedly invested $2 million worth of bitcoin with Genesis. These cases underscore the breadth of the alleged deception and its impact on unsuspecting individuals from various walks of life.
The lawsuit represents a significant effort by authorities to hold cryptocurrency entities accountable for deceptive practices that have harmed investors. It also highlights the challenges faced by regulators in overseeing the rapidly evolving and often opaque world of digital currencies.
As the legal proceedings unfold, attention will undoubtedly turn to the response from the defendants and the broader implications for the cryptocurrency industry. This case serves as a stark reminder of the risks inherent in investing in unregulated markets and the importance of thorough due diligence by investors.
For now, the expansion of the lawsuit signals a heightened scrutiny of cryptocurrency activities by law enforcement agencies, promising further developments in the ongoing efforts to protect investors and maintain the integrity of financial markets.
Source: Reuters
Featured News
Electrolux Fined €44.5 Million in French Antitrust Case
Dec 19, 2024 by
CPI
Indian Antitrust Body Raids Alcohol Giants Amid Price Collusion Probe
Dec 19, 2024 by
CPI
Attorneys Seek $525 Million in Fees in NCAA Settlement Case
Dec 19, 2024 by
CPI
Italy’s Competition Watchdog Ends Investigation into Booking.com
Dec 19, 2024 by
CPI
Minnesota Judge Approves $2.4 Million Hormel Settlement in Antitrust Case
Dec 19, 2024 by
CPI
Antitrust Mix by CPI
Antitrust Chronicle® – CRESSE Insights
Dec 19, 2024 by
CPI
Effective Interoperability in Mobile Ecosystems: EU Competition Law Versus Regulation
Dec 19, 2024 by
Giuseppe Colangelo
The Use of Empirical Evidence in Antitrust: Trends, Challenges, and a Path Forward
Dec 19, 2024 by
Eliana Garces
Some Empirical Evidence on the Role of Presumptions and Evidentiary Standards on Antitrust (Under)Enforcement: Is the EC’s New Communication on Art.102 in the Right Direction?
Dec 19, 2024 by
Yannis Katsoulacos
The EC’s Draft Guidelines on the Application of Article 102 TFEU: An Economic Perspective
Dec 19, 2024 by
Benoit Durand