A group of Call of Duty players has filed a lawsuit against gaming giant Activision Blizzard Inc., alleging the company’s monopoly control over the popular video game constitutes unlawful behavior. This legal action has far-reaching implications for the gaming industry, as it questions the extent of power that publishers hold over their players.
Reported by Bloomberg Law, the lawsuit highlights a pivotal moment where players are challenging the traditional dynamics of the gaming ecosystem. According to John Holden, an associate professor at Oklahoma State University specializing in esports, this marks the first instance of players taking legal action against a publisher to contest its monopoly over a single game.
Holden emphasized the significance of this case, stating, “They would lose this protection that we’ve thought for a long time sort of underpinned the industry.”
The plaintiffs argue that Activision Blizzard’s copyright control over Call of Duty has allowed the company to dominate the professional Call of Duty market by withholding game licenses from organizers of other competitions. This, they claim, unfairly restricts competition within the esports landscape.
Read more: FTC To Appeal Decision Allowing Microsoft’s Acquisition Of Activision Blizzard
The debate surrounding the lawsuit delves into the question of whether esports should be treated as traditional sports. Maureen Weston, a sports law expert at Pepperdine University Caruso School of Law, noted the distinction between physical sports equipment, which is typically not owned by any single entity, and the intellectual property inherent in video games.
A ruling in favor of the Call of Duty players could reshape the esports industry, limiting the market power of Activision Blizzard. Holden speculates that such a decision could empower players and teams to independently pursue opportunities within the esports realm, without the need for publisher intervention.
Activision Blizzard responded to the lawsuit, asserting its intention to vigorously defend itself against the claims. The company expressed disappointment over the legal action, stating it disrupts the efforts of various stakeholders invested in the success of the Call of Duty League.
Featured News
Judge Appoints Law Firms to Lead Consumer Antitrust Litigation Against Apple
Dec 22, 2024 by
CPI
Epic Health Systems Seeks Dismissal of Antitrust Suit Filed by Particle Health
Dec 22, 2024 by
CPI
Qualcomm Secures Partial Victory in Licensing Dispute with Arm, Jury Splits on Key Issues
Dec 22, 2024 by
CPI
Google Proposes Revised Revenue-Sharing Limits Amid Antitrust Battle
Dec 22, 2024 by
CPI
Japan’s Antitrust Authority Expected to Sanction Google Over Monopoly Practices
Dec 22, 2024 by
CPI
Antitrust Mix by CPI
Antitrust Chronicle® – CRESSE Insights
Dec 19, 2024 by
CPI
Effective Interoperability in Mobile Ecosystems: EU Competition Law Versus Regulation
Dec 19, 2024 by
Giuseppe Colangelo
The Use of Empirical Evidence in Antitrust: Trends, Challenges, and a Path Forward
Dec 19, 2024 by
Eliana Garces
Some Empirical Evidence on the Role of Presumptions and Evidentiary Standards on Antitrust (Under)Enforcement: Is the EC’s New Communication on Art.102 in the Right Direction?
Dec 19, 2024 by
Yannis Katsoulacos
The EC’s Draft Guidelines on the Application of Article 102 TFEU: An Economic Perspective
Dec 19, 2024 by
Benoit Durand