Chicken Suppliers Agree to Settle Price-Fixing Claims in Multi-Million Dollar Deal
In a significant development, major chicken suppliers including Perdue and Sanderson have reached a settlement in a long-standing legal battle over allegations of price-fixing. The agreement, which also involves other poultry producers, follows claims of conspiring to inflate prices, resulting in substantial overcharges for food distributors over the years.
Plaintiffs’ attorneys, representing a class action of direct purchasers of chicken, revealed in a court filing on Thursday their intention to seek preliminary approval from a federal judge in Chicago for the newly proposed settlements.
While the specific terms of the agreements were not immediately disclosed, the companies involved have consistently denied any wrongdoing, reporting Reuters.
Sanderson, which merged last year to form Oakwood, Georgia-based Wayne-Sanderson, along with Perdue, were among the defendants named in the settlement filing. Notably, they had previously secured victories in legal proceedings against the plaintiffs’ claims. However, the plaintiffs had contested these outcomes, leading to the current round of settlements.
Read more: Koch Reaches Settlement with DOJ Over Chicken Supplier Practices
The litigation has been ongoing, with consumers, direct purchasers of chicken, and commercial plaintiffs such as restaurants and grocery stores accusing the defendants of collusion to maintain artificially high prices. Allegations included tactics like production curbing and sharing nonpublic data about supply and demand to manipulate prices in their favor.
The settlement marks another chapter in this complex legal saga, with prior agreements already totaling more than $284 million with other chicken producers. Direct-purchaser plaintiffs in this case include well-known entities such as Maplevale Farms in New York, Pennsylvania-based John Gross & Company, and New Jersey’s Ferraro Foods.
Earlier settlements with other industry giants have been notable, with Tyson agreeing in 2021 to pay $80 million to direct purchaser plaintiffs, while Pilgrim’s Pride settled for $75 million in the same year.
Source: Reuters
Featured News
Judge Appoints Law Firms to Lead Consumer Antitrust Litigation Against Apple
Dec 22, 2024 by
CPI
Epic Health Systems Seeks Dismissal of Antitrust Suit Filed by Particle Health
Dec 22, 2024 by
CPI
Qualcomm Secures Partial Victory in Licensing Dispute with Arm, Jury Splits on Key Issues
Dec 22, 2024 by
CPI
Google Proposes Revised Revenue-Sharing Limits Amid Antitrust Battle
Dec 22, 2024 by
CPI
Japan’s Antitrust Authority Expected to Sanction Google Over Monopoly Practices
Dec 22, 2024 by
CPI
Antitrust Mix by CPI
Antitrust Chronicle® – CRESSE Insights
Dec 19, 2024 by
CPI
Effective Interoperability in Mobile Ecosystems: EU Competition Law Versus Regulation
Dec 19, 2024 by
Giuseppe Colangelo
The Use of Empirical Evidence in Antitrust: Trends, Challenges, and a Path Forward
Dec 19, 2024 by
Eliana Garces
Some Empirical Evidence on the Role of Presumptions and Evidentiary Standards on Antitrust (Under)Enforcement: Is the EC’s New Communication on Art.102 in the Right Direction?
Dec 19, 2024 by
Yannis Katsoulacos
The EC’s Draft Guidelines on the Application of Article 102 TFEU: An Economic Perspective
Dec 19, 2024 by
Benoit Durand