Former EU Antitrust Chief Warns Against National Champions in European Competition Strategy
Former European Union antitrust chief Mario Monti issued a cautionary note on Wednesday against the creation of national champions as a strategy to bolster the competitiveness of European businesses, particularly in the face of increasing global competition, notably from China.
Monti, who served as Italy’s Prime Minister and as the European Commission’s competition commissioner from 1999 to 2004, highlighted potential repercussions and the risk of weakening competition enforcement, reported Reuters.
Monti’s remarks come amid heightened discussions within the EU on how to enhance the region’s competitiveness, with Mario Draghi and Enrico Letta, both Italians, slated to present reports commissioned by the EU executive. These reports are expected to emphasize the role of state aid and advocate for more protectionist measures to support European businesses in critical sectors, aiming to level the playing field against international rivals.
During an OECD conference, Monti underscored the challenges European national champions could face outside the EU. He drew attention to the 2001 transatlantic dispute when the EU blocked the merger between General Electric (GE) and Honeywell, despite approval from U.S. authorities. The decision was criticized, with accusations that the EU prioritized protecting local interests over fostering competition.
Reflecting on the GE-Honeywell case, Monti highlighted that the merger was blocked in the EU due to legitimate concerns under EU laws, effectively preventing the merged entity from operating within the broader EU market. He acknowledged the desire for European champions but cautioned against policies that might compromise competition authorities’ impartiality and effectiveness.
Monti’s warnings echoed concerns about the potential misuse of competition enforcement powers to promote national champions, which could ultimately prove counterproductive. He emphasized that such actions could jeopardize the intended outcomes, undermining competitiveness rather than bolstering it.
Source: Reuters
Featured News
Judge Allows FTC Antitrust Case Against Amazon to Move Forward
Oct 1, 2024 by
CPI
SAP Leader Urges Caution on EU AI Rules, Warns of Competitive Disadvantage
Oct 1, 2024 by
CPI
Colorado’s Grocery Workers Unite to Oppose $24.6 Billion Supermarket Merge
Oct 1, 2024 by
CPI
Canada’s Competition Bureau Warns Businesses of Tougher Enforcement
Oct 1, 2024 by
CPI
Top Antitrust Lawyers Launch New Boutique Firm
Oct 1, 2024 by
CPI
Antitrust Mix by CPI
Antitrust Chronicle® – Refusal to Deal
Sep 27, 2024 by
CPI
Antitrust’s Refusal-to-Deal Doctrine: The Emperor Has No Clothes
Sep 27, 2024 by
Erik Hovenkamp
Why All Antitrust Claims are Refusal to Deal Claims and What that Means for Policy
Sep 27, 2024 by
Ramsi Woodcock
The Aspen Misadventure
Sep 27, 2024 by
Roger Blair & Holly P. Stidham
Refusal to Deal in Antitrust Law: Evolving Jurisprudence and Business Justifications in the Align Technology Case
Sep 27, 2024 by
Timothy Hsieh