The proposed sale of US Steel to its Japanese competitor Nippon Steel is now under intense scrutiny by the US Justice Department over potential antitrust issues, as reported by Politico.
The $14.1 billion deal has ignited a firestorm of criticism from various quarters, including lawmakers, labor unions, and concerned citizens, who argue against the acquisition of the iconic American industrial giant by a foreign entity, even one from a close ally like Japan. President Joe Biden has weighed in on the matter, issuing a rare statement emphasizing the importance of US Steel remaining under American ownership and operation.
The United Steelworkers union, a significant player in American politics courted by both Biden and former President Donald Trump during their respective campaigns, has vehemently opposed the deal. The union contends that the acquisition poses a threat to US jobs and the integrity of the American steel industry.
While concerns about foreign ownership of U.S. Steel have garnered significant attention, the current antitrust scrutiny focuses on a major manufacturing facility located in Calvert, Alabama. This plant, jointly owned by Nippon Steel and Luxembourg-based ArcelorMittal, is a key competitor to U.S. Steel, particularly in the automotive sector. Department of Justice attorneys have reportedly initiated inquiries with industry stakeholders, seeking insights into how the proposed joint venture between Nippon Steel and U.S. Steel would impact competition in the market.
Sources familiar with the matter, speaking on condition of anonymity due to the sensitive nature of the discussions, indicate that the antitrust review is still in its preliminary stages. The Justice Department has yet to commence a formal, in-depth investigation, and there remains a possibility that it may decide against such action. A final decision is anticipated later this month, according to reports from Politico.
The backdrop of this scrutiny includes previous attempts by other industry players to acquire U.S. Steel. Notably, U.S. Steel rebuffed a takeover bid from Cleveland-Cliffs, partly citing concerns about its ability to withstand antitrust scrutiny.
Cleveland-Cliffs, ArcelorMittal, and U.S. Steel are among the primary suppliers to the automotive sector, making any potential consolidation or acquisition in the industry a matter of considerable importance and scrutiny.
Source: Politico
Featured News
Electrolux Fined €44.5 Million in French Antitrust Case
Dec 19, 2024 by
CPI
Indian Antitrust Body Raids Alcohol Giants Amid Price Collusion Probe
Dec 19, 2024 by
CPI
Attorneys Seek $525 Million in Fees in NCAA Settlement Case
Dec 19, 2024 by
CPI
Italy’s Competition Watchdog Ends Investigation into Booking.com
Dec 19, 2024 by
CPI
Minnesota Judge Approves $2.4 Million Hormel Settlement in Antitrust Case
Dec 19, 2024 by
CPI
Antitrust Mix by CPI
Antitrust Chronicle® – CRESSE Insights
Dec 19, 2024 by
CPI
Effective Interoperability in Mobile Ecosystems: EU Competition Law Versus Regulation
Dec 19, 2024 by
Giuseppe Colangelo
The Use of Empirical Evidence in Antitrust: Trends, Challenges, and a Path Forward
Dec 19, 2024 by
Eliana Garces
Some Empirical Evidence on the Role of Presumptions and Evidentiary Standards on Antitrust (Under)Enforcement: Is the EC’s New Communication on Art.102 in the Right Direction?
Dec 19, 2024 by
Yannis Katsoulacos
The EC’s Draft Guidelines on the Application of Article 102 TFEU: An Economic Perspective
Dec 19, 2024 by
Benoit Durand