Alibaba announced on Tuesday its decision to forego the initial public offering (IPO) of its logistics arm, Cainiao, in Hong Kong. Instead, the e-commerce giant disclosed its intention to acquire the remaining 36% stake in Cainiao, which it does not already own, for up to $3.75 billion.
Alibaba’s move marks a departure from its earlier plans to list Cainiao independently on the Hong Kong stock exchange. The company, which presently holds approximately 64% of Cainiao’s shares, emphasized the strategic importance of the logistics business in its operations and outlined its commitment to bolstering a global logistics network.
Alibaba Group Chairman, Joe Tsai, clarified that regulatory concerns were not a driving factor behind the decision to withdraw Cainiao’s IPO. Tsai reiterated the company’s stance on market conditions, stating that all planned IPOs, including Cainiao’s, were contingent on favorable market dynamics. He underscored the challenging environment for capital market transactions, particularly in the Hong Kong market, citing subdued investor sentiment and decreased activity in the IPO space.
Read more: Alibaba Nears First Big Deal Since Antitrust Fine
Following the announcement, U.S.-listed shares in Alibaba experienced a modest uptick of 0.7% in pre-market trading, signaling investors’ approval of the decision. Tsai emphasized the company’s commitment to maximizing shareholder value and stated that pursuing capital market deals in the current climate would not be conducive to unlocking shareholder value effectively.
The decision comes amid a broader slowdown in the Hong Kong IPO market, which witnessed a considerable decline in activity in 2023. With only 73 company listings raising HK$46.3 billion ($5.92 billion), down 56% from the previous year, the market experienced a notable contraction, reflecting the challenging conditions for IPOs.
Source: Reuters
Featured News
Judge Appoints Law Firms to Lead Consumer Antitrust Litigation Against Apple
Dec 22, 2024 by
CPI
Epic Health Systems Seeks Dismissal of Antitrust Suit Filed by Particle Health
Dec 22, 2024 by
CPI
Qualcomm Secures Partial Victory in Licensing Dispute with Arm, Jury Splits on Key Issues
Dec 22, 2024 by
CPI
Google Proposes Revised Revenue-Sharing Limits Amid Antitrust Battle
Dec 22, 2024 by
CPI
Japan’s Antitrust Authority Expected to Sanction Google Over Monopoly Practices
Dec 22, 2024 by
CPI
Antitrust Mix by CPI
Antitrust Chronicle® – CRESSE Insights
Dec 19, 2024 by
CPI
Effective Interoperability in Mobile Ecosystems: EU Competition Law Versus Regulation
Dec 19, 2024 by
Giuseppe Colangelo
The Use of Empirical Evidence in Antitrust: Trends, Challenges, and a Path Forward
Dec 19, 2024 by
Eliana Garces
Some Empirical Evidence on the Role of Presumptions and Evidentiary Standards on Antitrust (Under)Enforcement: Is the EC’s New Communication on Art.102 in the Right Direction?
Dec 19, 2024 by
Yannis Katsoulacos
The EC’s Draft Guidelines on the Application of Article 102 TFEU: An Economic Perspective
Dec 19, 2024 by
Benoit Durand