Amid the rise of the “National Nail Tech Price Increase Day” online campaign, the UK’s Competition and Markets Authority (CMA) has issued a strong caution to nail technicians against potential price-fixing. The campaign, spearheaded by the trade organization Nail Tech Org (NTO), has drawn attention to the financial challenges faced by nail technicians, prompting over 5,000 professionals to consider raising their service fees.
According to NTO, nail technicians in the UK struggle to earn an average of just under £7 ($8.88) per hour, factoring in various overhead costs such as rent, energy, insurance, and products. This figure falls significantly below the recently increased national minimum wage of £11.44 ($14.51) per hour, which came into effect in April.
In response to the campaign, the CMA released an open letter cautioning businesses in the nail services industry to adhere to competition law, emphasizing the importance of setting prices independently. The authority explicitly stated that competitors should refrain from coordinating or discussing price increases, whether directly or through trade bodies or membership organizations.
Read more: UK Watchdog Warns Of Price Fixing Among Money Transfers Firms
Amy Guy, the founder of NTO, clarified that the campaign aimed to raise awareness among nail technicians about establishing sustainable and equitable businesses. She emphasized that any decisions regarding price adjustments would be made on an individual basis and that not all technicians would necessarily increase their rates.
The timing of the price hike campaign coincides with challenging economic circumstances in the UK. Following Russia’s invasion of Ukraine in 2022, the nation has grappled with soaring energy costs. Additionally, a widespread cost of living crisis has put pressure on consumers’ discretionary spending. Despite these challenges, demand for time-intensive nail services such as builder gel or acrylic manicures has surged in popularity.
Source: Business of Fashion
Featured News
Electrolux Fined €44.5 Million in French Antitrust Case
Dec 19, 2024 by
CPI
Indian Antitrust Body Raids Alcohol Giants Amid Price Collusion Probe
Dec 19, 2024 by
CPI
Attorneys Seek $525 Million in Fees in NCAA Settlement Case
Dec 19, 2024 by
CPI
Italy’s Competition Watchdog Ends Investigation into Booking.com
Dec 19, 2024 by
CPI
Minnesota Judge Approves $2.4 Million Hormel Settlement in Antitrust Case
Dec 19, 2024 by
CPI
Antitrust Mix by CPI
Antitrust Chronicle® – CRESSE Insights
Dec 19, 2024 by
CPI
Effective Interoperability in Mobile Ecosystems: EU Competition Law Versus Regulation
Dec 19, 2024 by
Giuseppe Colangelo
The Use of Empirical Evidence in Antitrust: Trends, Challenges, and a Path Forward
Dec 19, 2024 by
Eliana Garces
Some Empirical Evidence on the Role of Presumptions and Evidentiary Standards on Antitrust (Under)Enforcement: Is the EC’s New Communication on Art.102 in the Right Direction?
Dec 19, 2024 by
Yannis Katsoulacos
The EC’s Draft Guidelines on the Application of Article 102 TFEU: An Economic Perspective
Dec 19, 2024 by
Benoit Durand