![](https://www.pymnts.com/wp-content/uploads/2024/03/priority-technology-holdings-earnings.jpg)
By: Giovanna Masarotto (ProMarket)
Innovation is akin to a blessing beyond human control, yet in the realm of policymaking, its impact can be influenced. Examining the computer industry reveals instances where antitrust measures have effectively fostered innovation. This article delves into the antitrust enforcement actions taken against major players like AT&T, IBM, Microsoft, and Intel, and how they catalyzed innovation in computer hardware and software.
AT&T’s case stands out in the annals of U.S. antitrust, particularly its landmark 1982 decision mandating the breakup of the telecommunications giant. However, the story of AT&T’s antitrust saga is nuanced and profound, significantly shaping today’s computer economy. AT&T’s ownership of Bell Labs, renowned as an “idea factory,” birthed numerous Nobel Prize-winning inventions. Notably, the 1947 invention of the transistor by Bell Labs scientists William Shockley, John Bardeen, and Walter Brattain marked the advent of the digital era, permeating modern digital devices.
While this history is well-documented, the swift adoption of the transistor is less remembered—a realm where antitrust played a pivotal role. AT&T, facing antitrust scrutiny in the mid-20th century, agreed to a consent decree in 1956 following a Department of Justice investigation. Among its provisions was the requirement for AT&T to grant non-exclusive licenses for its patents, including the transistor, to all applicants. This compelled sharing of groundbreaking technology facilitated its rapid integration into various industries.
Economists like Peter Grindley and David Teece have lauded this remedy, citing it as a catalyst for economic growth and innovation. Intel’s co-founder Gordon Moore echoed this sentiment, recognizing the decree’s significance for the semiconductor industry. Notably, AT&T’s acceptance of the compulsory license remedy was a means to resolve the DOJ’s antitrust probe initiated in 1949—a testament to the collaborative nature of consent decrees, often shaped by input from investigated parties who have inadvertently shaped the market accused of monopolization.
Featured News
Microsoft Defends Game Pass Price Hike in Response to FTC Criticism
Jul 22, 2024 by
CPI
SEC Launches Interagency Securities Council
Jul 22, 2024 by
CPI
Congress Demands Answers from CrowdStrike CEO Following Massive Global Outage
Jul 22, 2024 by
CPI
Dutch Competition Regulator Confronts Meta Over ‘Free’ Subscriptions
Jul 22, 2024 by
CPI
EU Antitrust Regulators Accept Vifor Pharma’s Pledge to Halt Disparagement of Rival
Jul 22, 2024 by
CPI
Antitrust Mix by CPI
Antitrust Chronicle® – Private Equity Roll-Up Schemes
Jun 28, 2024 by
CPI
The FTC’s Focus on Private Equity is Warranted
Jun 28, 2024 by
CPI
Unraveling the Roll-Up: Private Equity’s Misunderstood Investment Strategy
Jun 28, 2024 by
CPI
Antitrust Focus on Private Equity Funds and Serial Acquisitions
Jun 28, 2024 by
CPI
Private Equity Roll-Ups Amidst Heightened Antitrust Enforcement
Jun 28, 2024 by
CPI