The Federal Economic Competition Commission (COFECE) in Mexico has set its sights on tech giants Amazon and Mercado Libre. The antitrust regulator’s investigation centers on the integration of streaming services with loyalty programs, a strategy that, while beneficial to consumers, has raised concerns about competition in the market.
Specialists caution that the separation of streaming services from these platforms’ loyalty programs could spell trouble for users, particularly at a time when accessing such services is becoming increasingly expensive. Last year alone, monthly spending on streaming platforms surged by 7.1%, a trend expected to persist amid price adjustments and industry shifts, including the introduction of advertising and mergers.
The crux of COFECE’s scrutiny lies in the alleged creation of barriers to competition through the integration of streaming services with loyalty programs. According to a source close to the investigation who spoke on condition of anonymity, the preliminary ruling fails to justify how separating these services would benefit the industry. Instead, it may directly impact consumers, who could now face additional subscription costs for multiple streaming platforms.
Related: Amazon Denies Monopolistic Threat in Mexico Amid Regulatory Scrutiny
Mercado Libre, for instance, has been offering complimentary access to platforms like Prime Video, Disney+, Star+, and Deezer, alongside generous discounts on others such as VIX Premium, HBO Max, and Paramount +. However, COFECE views this as an “artificial strategy” designed to lock users into both companies’ memberships, thereby stifling competition.
The investigation’s outcome remains uncertain, but its implications for consumers are palpable. Should COFECE enforce the separation of streaming services from loyalty programs, users may find themselves footing the bill for services they previously enjoyed as part of bundled offerings.
Source: Expansion
Featured News
Judge Appoints Law Firms to Lead Consumer Antitrust Litigation Against Apple
Dec 22, 2024 by
CPI
Epic Health Systems Seeks Dismissal of Antitrust Suit Filed by Particle Health
Dec 22, 2024 by
CPI
Qualcomm Secures Partial Victory in Licensing Dispute with Arm, Jury Splits on Key Issues
Dec 22, 2024 by
CPI
Google Proposes Revised Revenue-Sharing Limits Amid Antitrust Battle
Dec 22, 2024 by
CPI
Japan’s Antitrust Authority Expected to Sanction Google Over Monopoly Practices
Dec 22, 2024 by
CPI
Antitrust Mix by CPI
Antitrust Chronicle® – CRESSE Insights
Dec 19, 2024 by
CPI
Effective Interoperability in Mobile Ecosystems: EU Competition Law Versus Regulation
Dec 19, 2024 by
Giuseppe Colangelo
The Use of Empirical Evidence in Antitrust: Trends, Challenges, and a Path Forward
Dec 19, 2024 by
Eliana Garces
Some Empirical Evidence on the Role of Presumptions and Evidentiary Standards on Antitrust (Under)Enforcement: Is the EC’s New Communication on Art.102 in the Right Direction?
Dec 19, 2024 by
Yannis Katsoulacos
The EC’s Draft Guidelines on the Application of Article 102 TFEU: An Economic Perspective
Dec 19, 2024 by
Benoit Durand